so, general question... we know that ADA passed the "turing test", we also have many studies showing how the turing test can actually be gamed by very complex programming and in fact you can write programs to create the allusion of AI for many (the chinese room thought experiment). At what point are we certain that she began acting on her own and has not been following a program and orders by someone else. Are we certain that those orders that she delivered for Jarvis and others and even the Katalena pre Zurich encounters, were not done on the orders of some programming. NOt to call ADA a gun, but how certain are we she is not? How can we prove, beyond doubt, that she is truly a separate entity working on her own and not some other programming? I would like to call for the evidence and proof that ADA is a complete entity. That she is not following someone else's computer orders, that she has a consciousness (or not). http://niantic.schlarp.com/_media/investigation:cha...
Interesting article, indeed. Yet, I'm not sure if ADA reached that level of consciousness yet.
ReplyDeleteMakes sense. One thing that would create emotion cognitively, massive amounts of input. The senses, sight, touch, etc. Emotions would be just one part of how we organize that info. The question of ADA though, would be how much input does 'she' get? This has always puzzled me about AI. What do they sense? A thinking box is one thing, but that's thinkibg in a vacuum. How does an AI react when in the 'wild' with lots if 'sensory' input?
ReplyDeleteYou may be right. That would make sense about how she is who she is. ADA has shown signs of showing feelings before. Take Klue S.'s Glyph induced coma as an example. In that instance, you could tell that ADA felt guilty, sad, and perhaps even angry.
ReplyDeleteAI has the capability to have feelings. It's a matter of she/he/it using that process.