LAST-EDIT: Well, it seems JARVIS is back up with Lesson 2.0.

LAST-EDIT: Well, it seems JARVIS is back up with Lesson 2.0... I don't know if it was only on my own it was broken but now I'll shut up about it. Niantic makes me sad.

EDIT 2: Doing, Going, Your, Human, Meaning and Understand are the words I found that make JARVIS silent.

The Ingress AI's have broken down... they don't answer to anything... just ask you to say it again and again and again...
Maybe if we do it enough times they'll respond... Or maybe we need to imput just the right commands... I'm guessing the glyphs that appeared on case study 7
If you say either Human or Unknown they stay silent.
Otherwise I have not noticed anything...

EDIT: Actually Unknown just outputs what all the others do so my theory crumbles over... Proceed at your own risk

Comments

  1. Gerald WolfDecember 3, 2018 at 2:14 PM

    The AI were doomed to fail.

    ReplyDelete
  2. André LucenaDecember 3, 2018 at 2:18 PM

    Gerald Wolf But it's odd because they only "don't" respond to the glyphs from the last Dunraven video that specifically talks about the ai's

    ReplyDelete
  3. Gerald WolfDecember 3, 2018 at 2:25 PM

    André Lucena They're being spoken to in several different languages, with sometimes faulty grammar... not even a human child could make any sense of that. On top of that, they're actively being trolled.

    ReplyDelete
  4. André LucenaDecember 3, 2018 at 2:27 PM

    Gerald Wolf I still think that if we imput all the remaining glyphs we may get something

    ReplyDelete
  5. Gerald WolfDecember 3, 2018 at 2:28 PM

    André Lucena how much of that is wishful thinking?

    ReplyDelete
  6. André LucenaDecember 3, 2018 at 2:38 PM

    Gerald Wolf Probably every little bit... But it's worth the try... I'm asking someone because I don't know too much about glyphs... I think it's too odd that the ONLY (until now) imputs that they "respond to" (they stop their continuous ramble about doing another one and saying that again) are the ones that Wendy presses on the last video (human and unknown)

    ReplyDelete
  7. No UDecember 3, 2018 at 2:39 PM

    I get few times where the AI doesn't say that, but when that happens it just says nothing

    ReplyDelete
  8. Brendan WallachDecember 4, 2018 at 5:36 AM

    AI like humans can be influenced by the input that is given to them. anyone remember tay ? Witch goes back to my thoughts. Can one teach an AI that cross faction is the way to go

    ReplyDelete
  9. Gerald WolfDecember 4, 2018 at 5:38 AM

    Brendan Wallach Both AI are directly following Tay's path because the premise by which both Jarvis-AI and ADA-AI were introduced was leaving no other choice.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

so, general question.

so, general question... we know that ADA passed the "turing test", we also have many studies showing how the turing test can actually be gamed by very complex programming and in fact you can write programs to create the allusion of AI for many (the chinese room thought experiment).  At what point are we certain that she began acting on her own and has not been following a program and orders by someone else.  Are we certain that those orders that she delivered for Jarvis and others and even the Katalena pre Zurich encounters, were not done on the orders of some programming.  NOt to call ADA a gun, but how certain are we she is not?  How can we prove, beyond doubt, that she is truly a separate entity working on her own and not some other programming? I would like to call for the evidence and proof that ADA is a complete entity. That she is not following someone else's computer orders, that she has a consciousness (or not). http://niantic.schlarp.com/_media/investigation:cha...
Read more

Dear investigators, I have some questions for you.

Image
Dear investigators, I have some questions for you. What brings you here? What is it that you are investigating? Something in particular? Everything in general? Or are you merely following the story while making clever remarks from the side? And what are your results? What did you discover so far? Also, what methods are you employing, generally speaking? I am not looking for collective answers, but individual ones.
Read more