Ok finally!!!!! I've known about these since last week but didn't want to post them and possibly make people upset. I am beyond thrilled to see some of the Glyphs we asked for be seen and no this isn't all of the new ones, there are more.
That's very interesting. All glyphs known so far can be expressed using a 32 element/bit pattern. Glyph 1|4 and 3|5 would break with this rule, which would void some theories i have about the internal representation of glyphs …
Hello, Essexians. After a discussion, we will be producing Operation Essex challenge coins. These will be member-only coins, so please do not share this form with people who are not in the community. Also, we will cross-check that people who order the coins are, in fact, Essex members with the community. Prices and more details are specified on the form. Because of time constraints, orders will only be open until tomorrow 23:59 EST time. Please, make sure to get your orders in. https://docs.google.com/forms/d/1VinKIIcLvJN4SoVGn1RIaCn8qMl7HT1u4hhGh3mki1c/viewform
So - throwing this out there to get discussion going. if there really is a G+ end coming - what should we do with the Operation Essex Community? How would we archive it? Where would we move to (Forum Boards are the ideal type of structure). Thoughts?
Wait how many episodes have aired???
ReplyDeleteHunter Smurf 11
ReplyDeleteIshira Tsubasa Daniel Beaudoin
ReplyDeleteOk finally!!!!! I've known about these since last week but didn't want to post them and possibly make people upset. I am beyond thrilled to see some of the Glyphs we asked for be seen and no this isn't all of the new ones, there are more.
ReplyDeleteThat's very interesting. All glyphs known so far can be expressed using a 32 element/bit pattern. Glyph 1|4 and 3|5 would break with this rule, which would void some theories i have about the internal representation of glyphs …
ReplyDeleteYes udi taren it adds a lot more possibilities with Glyphs!
ReplyDeleteOh yeah!!! Thanks for the heads up, Achim S.! :D
ReplyDeleteStill think they gyphs are 3d in 2d form
ReplyDelete