Sorry. I had to eliminate the previous post. Here comes again... T_T
Sorry. I had to eliminate the previous post. Here comes again... T_T
Greetings Investigative Community!
I come to share with you my suspicions with you about the identity of camp' Navarro's mystery visitor. I guess many of you already heard this, but I have strong reasons to believe she is the Carrie Campbell from the Prime/Osiris Universe.
Since my interactions with her in Navarro, I've been maintaining conversations with her regarding several topics (I'll show here what I believe it's interesting for our investigative conversation). After a few weeks I learnt that AtLaZ TD has also been talking to her (and I'm waiting for him to write his side of this information gathering that we've been doing) who had evidence to claim that the woman was aligned with the resistance. So I suggested she was very curious and eager to learn things in general. We were still playing around with the idea that she might be Jarvis-P, so I brought to the discussion that she told Mario Valenzuela II she wasn't an artist when he asked her at camp.
Then, we started piecing bits of information together: She told me she was going to San Diego (actually, she asked me if I was going because she wanted us to meet), so then Mario Valenzuela II pointed out that we have intel that Carrie is supposed to appear at San Diego, so she might be Carrie.
Following that idea, I started asking questions about the study of Glyphs... She did not only said she was studying them but she was good at answering my more to the point questions I used to try to determine if she was in fact a language scientist or else.
Funny thing though! The Carrie from our universe was a semiotician. But her answers were a bit more leaning towards more formal linguistics. (I specifically asked a couple of things from which I was expecting answer 'X' to confirm she was a semiotician and I got answer 'Y').
What do you think?
Disclaimer: As you can see in the later picture, I asked her about posting our conversations here before I even thought of doing so.
Greetings Investigative Community!
I come to share with you my suspicions with you about the identity of camp' Navarro's mystery visitor. I guess many of you already heard this, but I have strong reasons to believe she is the Carrie Campbell from the Prime/Osiris Universe.
Since my interactions with her in Navarro, I've been maintaining conversations with her regarding several topics (I'll show here what I believe it's interesting for our investigative conversation). After a few weeks I learnt that AtLaZ TD has also been talking to her (and I'm waiting for him to write his side of this information gathering that we've been doing) who had evidence to claim that the woman was aligned with the resistance. So I suggested she was very curious and eager to learn things in general. We were still playing around with the idea that she might be Jarvis-P, so I brought to the discussion that she told Mario Valenzuela II she wasn't an artist when he asked her at camp.
Then, we started piecing bits of information together: She told me she was going to San Diego (actually, she asked me if I was going because she wanted us to meet), so then Mario Valenzuela II pointed out that we have intel that Carrie is supposed to appear at San Diego, so she might be Carrie.
Following that idea, I started asking questions about the study of Glyphs... She did not only said she was studying them but she was good at answering my more to the point questions I used to try to determine if she was in fact a language scientist or else.
Funny thing though! The Carrie from our universe was a semiotician. But her answers were a bit more leaning towards more formal linguistics. (I specifically asked a couple of things from which I was expecting answer 'X' to confirm she was a semiotician and I got answer 'Y').
What do you think?
Disclaimer: As you can see in the later picture, I asked her about posting our conversations here before I even thought of doing so.
What if she is herself (instead if anyone we may or may not know)?
ReplyDeleteThat's a good possibility too Gerald Wolf I'm anyway excited about this characters from the prime universe investigating glyphs and going to San Diego. Nevertheless, you can't deny the coincidences of research subject and placement at the anomaly are pretty interesting.
ReplyDeleteJust think about it: Oliver-Prime introduced himself as Oliver in Navarro, didn't he? And how did the other "mysterious" visitor introduce herself?
ReplyDeleteThe currently available Anomaly Intel labels the benefactor as "Carrie Campbell", which is different from how the Navarro-visitor introduced herself.
I understand that people are used to thinking in categories and referencing "new" things to already known "old" things but isn't this a bit excessive? Being compared and measured to someone different might lead to missing a few details and therefore I'd suggest getting to know her as "herself" - even if in the end she turns out to be an reincarnation of someone else - it's fairer and more respectful towards her.
(it's like comparing the new boyfriend to the ex with everything he does instead of loving him for who he is)
Oh well... There are some interesting points there. She was elusive towards her identity and that's why we are all theorising things. To be honest, to have a fully new person of interest would be extremely interesting to me. Now, don't get me wrong, even if she is Carrie-P I'm not really comparing her to our Carrie except from the fact they might have the same role in the project. I didn't get to know our Carrie and from what I see in the videos Carrie appears in she seems pretty different. So at a personal level she is just a very cool person I'm getting to know and I like to interact with. As an investigator, however, I can't help to look at the clues and try to put them together.
ReplyDeleteCatalina Reyes *clues :P
ReplyDeleteHahahahahaha... I'll fix that!!! I think autocorrect misses her too xP
ReplyDeleteHmmm, I'm skeptical that this is the new Jarvis, Jarvis had no ethical hangups about altering thought patterns, Campbell seems more plausible.
ReplyDeleteThat's what I'm proposing Bela Oehser :)
ReplyDeleteI know, just since you said the idea of it being Jarvis was being humored by some lol
ReplyDeleteBela Oehser Oh yes! I made arguments both in favour and against that idea in the past, you know, to explore the possibilities and such :)
ReplyDeleteah gotcha!
ReplyDelete