Is the pic realy changing or haven't i get the point?

Is the pic realy changing or haven't i get the point?

Comments

  1. Salvador “Brutalion” RojasNovember 29, 2016 at 8:05 AM

    Activated?

    ReplyDelete
  2. Salvador “Brutalion” RojasNovember 29, 2016 at 8:06 AM

    Multiplied?

    ReplyDelete
  3. maRschineNovember 29, 2016 at 8:08 AM

    This is photoshop. Shifty triple fs flip to bs nollie fastforward.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Salvador “Brutalion” RojasNovember 29, 2016 at 8:08 AM

    This has been published recently, the one from the right

    ReplyDelete
  5. Ralph Födisch (CitizenOfTime)November 29, 2016 at 8:11 AM

    The first one is like i think i saw it the first time (this is from a telegram chat) the second is like its now appears everywhere... Don't have an Idea what happend...

    ReplyDelete
  6. Ralph Födisch (CitizenOfTime)November 29, 2016 at 8:18 AM

    To be correct: The first pic is taken out of the "project Isthmus TG" posted as link to Julia Vivienne Loverdose​ G+ Post... the second is from the post...

    ReplyDelete
  7. Arturo SoteloNovember 29, 2016 at 8:26 AM

    Where there was one there will be many...

    ReplyDelete
  8. Salvador “Brutalion” RojasNovember 29, 2016 at 8:30 AM

    That's what I meant concerning yesterday post Arturo Sotelo​

    ReplyDelete
  9. Ryan SchoonNovember 29, 2016 at 8:31 AM

    If you put it really close to your nose, then pull back with your eyes still out of focus... you don't see anything interesting.

    ReplyDelete
  10. maRschineNovember 29, 2016 at 9:18 AM

    I SAW LOT OF CODE. But i ask PA... why do you give that to agents... regardless...
    This is intentional. And i fear these intentions not to be good for us all.

    ReplyDelete
  11. David AdamsNovember 29, 2016 at 9:37 AM

    Let us not forget that we believe it was H. Richard Loeb​ who we believe was the person standing in front of the Tecthulu in this post:

    https://plus.google.com/117679301856096278984/posts/1db5xvCqFyd

    With this image also coming from H. Richard Loeb​ could it be possible that he is partially responsible for the what has become of the machine? Perhaps he is working with Oliver Lynton-Wolfe​ in creating more than one Tecthulu?

    One has to question.

    ReplyDelete
  12. Martin BrennerNovember 29, 2016 at 10:03 AM

    You remember all those lines in the image from the Seoul briefcase? Like lines to do mirror operations on the image. https://plus.google.com/u/0/117679301856096278984/posts/1db5xvCqFyd

    ReplyDelete
  13. Julia Vivienne LoverdoseNovember 29, 2016 at 10:11 AM

    Indeed, Ralph Födisch​, the decomposition I did yesterday wasn't perfect. I could get rid of the overlapping shadows and the result looked rather confusing.

    I have news on this subject though. I re-iterate my algorithm. Here are new better results:

    https://plus.google.com/+JuliaVivienneLoverdose/posts/iNFyVJzB2cn

    ReplyDelete
  14. Daeniem LoidlanNovember 29, 2016 at 10:18 AM

    I cant not see a strange similitude with the ABADN machine.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

so, general question.

so, general question... we know that ADA passed the "turing test", we also have many studies showing how the turing test can actually be gamed by very complex programming and in fact you can write programs to create the allusion of AI for many (the chinese room thought experiment).  At what point are we certain that she began acting on her own and has not been following a program and orders by someone else.  Are we certain that those orders that she delivered for Jarvis and others and even the Katalena pre Zurich encounters, were not done on the orders of some programming.  NOt to call ADA a gun, but how certain are we she is not?  How can we prove, beyond doubt, that she is truly a separate entity working on her own and not some other programming? I would like to call for the evidence and proof that ADA is a complete entity. That she is not following someone else's computer orders, that she has a consciousness (or not). http://niantic.schlarp.com/_media/investigation:cha...
Read more

Dear investigators, I have some questions for you.

Image
Dear investigators, I have some questions for you. What brings you here? What is it that you are investigating? Something in particular? Everything in general? Or are you merely following the story while making clever remarks from the side? And what are your results? What did you discover so far? Also, what methods are you employing, generally speaking? I am not looking for collective answers, but individual ones.
Read more