Dear fellow agents

Originally shared by Andreas Decker (thedeacon1972)

Dear fellow agents,

only two weeks until ViaNoir! Make sure to submit your predictions for the outcome of each anomaly site. The two prestigious titles "King of prophets" ( Most points in ViaNoir) and "Emperor of Prophets 2016" (Most points at ViaNoir and ViaLux Day 2 combined) are at stake. Just fill out the Formular below to participate!
https://docs.google.com/forms/d/1DsEGd-4lOJ7yK8OQVbqE3YOEj6C3JeWTU4fFmEDArKA/edit?usp=drive_web

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

so, general question.

so, general question... we know that ADA passed the "turing test", we also have many studies showing how the turing test can actually be gamed by very complex programming and in fact you can write programs to create the allusion of AI for many (the chinese room thought experiment).  At what point are we certain that she began acting on her own and has not been following a program and orders by someone else.  Are we certain that those orders that she delivered for Jarvis and others and even the Katalena pre Zurich encounters, were not done on the orders of some programming.  NOt to call ADA a gun, but how certain are we she is not?  How can we prove, beyond doubt, that she is truly a separate entity working on her own and not some other programming? I would like to call for the evidence and proof that ADA is a complete entity. That she is not following someone else's computer orders, that she has a consciousness (or not). http://niantic.schlarp.com/_media/investigation:cha...
Read more

Dear investigators, I have some questions for you.

Image
Dear investigators, I have some questions for you. What brings you here? What is it that you are investigating? Something in particular? Everything in general? Or are you merely following the story while making clever remarks from the side? And what are your results? What did you discover so far? Also, what methods are you employing, generally speaking? I am not looking for collective answers, but individual ones.
Read more