9495c7c6e4b653e315d48f0f68fe700c5b97470e

9495c7c6e4b653e315d48f0f68fe700c5b97470e


Que será esto?

Comments

  1. Jeffrey HuesemanAugust 22, 2016 at 2:12 PM

    Passcodes, or a code that leads to a passcode

    ReplyDelete
  2. Sergio Montserrat (Puntox)August 22, 2016 at 2:40 PM

    Should be hexadecimal code....

    ReplyDelete
  3. Aren YasharAugust 22, 2016 at 2:43 PM

    It looks like hex to me too. But converted to ASCII it is still meaningless to me

    ÇÆä¶SãÔhþp[G

    I tried using a rot13 decryption on it, but that lead me deeper into the briar patch and no closer to a solution. Good luck?

    ReplyDelete
  4. Aren YasharAugust 22, 2016 at 2:45 PM

    Maybe in binary with a fixed length the ones will spell out plaintext? Not equipped for that manipulation on my iPad, and my computer recently died so in process of getting the next generation online.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Sergio Montserrat (Puntox)August 22, 2016 at 2:59 PM

    DEC : 848270848141329065568252864380689750440591968014

    HEX: 9495C7C6E4B653E315D48F0F68FE700C5B97470E

    I got rubbish on ascci
    ÇÆä¶SãÔhþp[G

    ReplyDelete
  6. Sergio Montserrat (Puntox)August 22, 2016 at 3:00 PM

    Also got something. Can't make it out, I'm no programmer.
    const uint8_t data[] = {0x9495c7c6e4b653e315d48f0f68fe700c5b97470e};

    ReplyDelete
  7. Sergio Montserrat (Puntox)August 22, 2016 at 3:03 PM

    Or transform an unsigned value into a signed one, or vice versa, for example:

    (uint8_t) -1 : convert the signed int “-1” to an unsigned byte (i.e. “255”)

    So, it's a value converter from signed to unsigned digits..... might be as far as I can get, though.

    ReplyDelete
  8. Jose Gabriel Canche MayAugust 22, 2016 at 3:04 PM

    Sergio Montserrat Thanks , really, thanks

    ReplyDelete
  9. Walter Yung (UltraRailgun)August 22, 2016 at 7:06 PM

    Where did you get this? Maybe it's a SHA1 hash result

    ReplyDelete
  10. Jose Gabriel Canche MayAugust 22, 2016 at 7:21 PM

    Walter Yung It's weird, but I get to my mail, I was talking to some friends of Ingress and research ADA when, a few minutes (5) I get that key, I do not understand, and although it may be a mistake (which I has arrived), I think that not everything is what it seems

    ReplyDelete
  11. Conny PearceAugust 22, 2016 at 10:51 PM

    Sergio Montserrat Are you sure about the DEC result? Looks awfully small for such a big HEX...

    ReplyDelete
  12. Sergio Montserrat (Puntox)August 22, 2016 at 10:53 PM

    Conny Pearce Sadly, not. I passed it through a converter and copied it straight from the result, but it could be truncated somewhere.

    ReplyDelete
  13. Daniel Scherrer (ufufuo)August 22, 2016 at 11:36 PM

    Looks to me that the delimiters have to be applied first:
    9495 c7c 6e4b653e315d48 f0f 68fe700c5b97470e
    3e3 might be also something

    ReplyDelete
  14. Conny PearceAugust 23, 2016 at 12:46 AM

    Sergio Montserrat I checked that. It is correct, but I can make no sence of it...

    Daniel Scherrer Why do you think these are delimiters? Because of the symetry?

    ReplyDelete
  15. Daniel Scherrer (ufufuo)August 23, 2016 at 12:55 AM

    Conny Pearce Yes, and the numbers in the delimiters might be needed to decode the parts separately. could also be totally wrong, checking some arranging things

    ReplyDelete
  16. Federico Pasqua (eisterman)August 23, 2016 at 4:19 AM

    In tail there are e3e3.
    How you have obtained that? The mail maybe contain another tip

    ReplyDelete
  17. Walter Yung (UltraRailgun)August 23, 2016 at 4:24 AM

    maybe it's better for you to download the source of the mail and share it here. it's possible that other clues are hidden in those non-visible parts (eg. html code) of the mail.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

so, general question.

so, general question... we know that ADA passed the "turing test", we also have many studies showing how the turing test can actually be gamed by very complex programming and in fact you can write programs to create the allusion of AI for many (the chinese room thought experiment).  At what point are we certain that she began acting on her own and has not been following a program and orders by someone else.  Are we certain that those orders that she delivered for Jarvis and others and even the Katalena pre Zurich encounters, were not done on the orders of some programming.  NOt to call ADA a gun, but how certain are we she is not?  How can we prove, beyond doubt, that she is truly a separate entity working on her own and not some other programming? I would like to call for the evidence and proof that ADA is a complete entity. That she is not following someone else's computer orders, that she has a consciousness (or not). http://niantic.schlarp.com/_media/investigation:cha...
Read more

Dear investigators, I have some questions for you.

Image
Dear investigators, I have some questions for you. What brings you here? What is it that you are investigating? Something in particular? Everything in general? Or are you merely following the story while making clever remarks from the side? And what are your results? What did you discover so far? Also, what methods are you employing, generally speaking? I am not looking for collective answers, but individual ones.
Read more