The new email from investigae.ingress.com's emali list had this string of letter in it:

The new email from investigae.ingress.com's emali list had this string of letter in it:

ttyouuyyteyiiwyoytuuiptwiettir

I am no decoder, but i am trying to see if this will have any kind of info to help us. any help will be appreciated. (If it is anything at all -_-)

Comments

  1. mike tookerApril 9, 2016 at 6:17 AM

    ps, i tried many different keywords for a Vigenere's cipher and got nothing

    ReplyDelete
  2. Davo BrawnApril 9, 2016 at 7:39 AM

    It was just a passcode. Try typing it out and notice where all the letters are.

    ReplyDelete
  3. mike tookerApril 9, 2016 at 7:42 AM

    What do you mean by where all the letters are? Davo Brawn​

    ReplyDelete
  4. Stuart MengesApril 9, 2016 at 9:19 AM

    All on the top line of the keyboard

    ReplyDelete
  5. Stuart MengesApril 9, 2016 at 9:20 AM

    Pass code for Ingress kit? 1

    ReplyDelete
  6. Jeffrey HuesemanApril 9, 2016 at 10:33 AM

    55697766536882696577805835584 as a qwerty to number conversion with q=1 correspondence.

    ReplyDelete
  7. mike tookerApril 9, 2016 at 11:32 AM

    Jeffrey Hueseman +1 for the numbers

    ReplyDelete
  8. Mike BarbourApril 9, 2016 at 5:33 PM

    Jeffrey Hueseman can you explain that as in Ingress for dummies please? I have never figured out what anyone is talking about yet....no idea how to decode anything but would like to learn☺

    ReplyDelete
  9. mike tookerApril 9, 2016 at 5:37 PM

    Lol that's where I am too Michel Barbour​. But if you look at the original strand of letters, you would notice they are all on the "qwerty" level of a keyboard. What Jeffrey Hueseman​ did was changed the "qwerty" level with numbers starting with "q" being "1" and that is how we got to the numbers

    ReplyDelete
  10. mike tookerApril 9, 2016 at 5:38 PM

    I don't know where to go from this though. Michel Barbour​ there is going to be another level to turn this into a passcode, but I don't know how...

    ReplyDelete
  11. Davo BrawnApril 9, 2016 at 5:47 PM

    One very common decoding step is some conversion between DEC \ HEX \ ASCII Text.
    Try pasting the string:  55 69 77 66 53 68 82 69 65 77 80 52 83 55 84
    into the Decimal box here:  http://multidec.web-lab.at/mc.php

    ReplyDelete
  12. Jeffrey HuesemanApril 9, 2016 at 6:02 PM

    My results 7emb5 dreamP457t. Looks like a pass code to me. case could be different.

    ReplyDelete
  13. Dave Teddy (Dave1482)April 11, 2016 at 1:25 PM

    that was a passcode. FR

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

so, general question.

so, general question... we know that ADA passed the "turing test", we also have many studies showing how the turing test can actually be gamed by very complex programming and in fact you can write programs to create the allusion of AI for many (the chinese room thought experiment).  At what point are we certain that she began acting on her own and has not been following a program and orders by someone else.  Are we certain that those orders that she delivered for Jarvis and others and even the Katalena pre Zurich encounters, were not done on the orders of some programming.  NOt to call ADA a gun, but how certain are we she is not?  How can we prove, beyond doubt, that she is truly a separate entity working on her own and not some other programming? I would like to call for the evidence and proof that ADA is a complete entity. That she is not following someone else's computer orders, that she has a consciousness (or not). http://niantic.schlarp.com/_media/investigation:cha...
Read more

Dear investigators, I have some questions for you.

Image
Dear investigators, I have some questions for you. What brings you here? What is it that you are investigating? Something in particular? Everything in general? Or are you merely following the story while making clever remarks from the side? And what are your results? What did you discover so far? Also, what methods are you employing, generally speaking? I am not looking for collective answers, but individual ones.
Read more