N'zeer Shapers


N'zeer <=> Shapers

Which is which?
Does it matter?

"In theoretical physics, the anti-de Sitter/conformal field theory correspondence, sometimes called Maldacena duality or gauge/gravity duality, is a conjectured relationship between two kinds of physical theories. On one side of the correspondence are conformal field theories (CFT) which are quantum field theories, including theories similar to the Yang–Mills theories that describe elementary particles. On the other side are anti-de Sitter spaces (AdS) which are used in theories of quantum gravity, formulated in terms of string theory or M-theory."

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AdS/CFT_correspondence

"Shapers" related to "Elementary Particles"?
"N'zeer" related to "Quantum Gravity"?

Comments

  1. Typhoon JimDecember 7, 2015 at 9:31 PM

    Brandon Downey's recent post hints at this idea: that there is a fundamental quantum interaction at the heart of the conflict between Shapers and N'zeer.

    ReplyDelete
  2. moonfleetDecember 7, 2015 at 10:57 PM

    What I am suggesting is that there's even a deeper more fundamental connection. Not an interaction but an equivalency. That the Shapers and the N'zeer are just different descriptions of the same thing.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Typhoon JimDecember 8, 2015 at 6:57 AM

    moonfleet that's a solid idea, and one which is supported by Oliver Lynton Wolfe's statements during Cassandra that there are multiple Shaper civilizations. It's reasonable to assume he was talking about the N'zeer, maybe even others.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

so, general question.

so, general question... we know that ADA passed the "turing test", we also have many studies showing how the turing test can actually be gamed by very complex programming and in fact you can write programs to create the allusion of AI for many (the chinese room thought experiment).  At what point are we certain that she began acting on her own and has not been following a program and orders by someone else.  Are we certain that those orders that she delivered for Jarvis and others and even the Katalena pre Zurich encounters, were not done on the orders of some programming.  NOt to call ADA a gun, but how certain are we she is not?  How can we prove, beyond doubt, that she is truly a separate entity working on her own and not some other programming? I would like to call for the evidence and proof that ADA is a complete entity. That she is not following someone else's computer orders, that she has a consciousness (or not). http://niantic.schlarp.com/_media/investigation:cha...
Read more

Dear investigators, I have some questions for you.

Image
Dear investigators, I have some questions for you. What brings you here? What is it that you are investigating? Something in particular? Everything in general? Or are you merely following the story while making clever remarks from the side? And what are your results? What did you discover so far? Also, what methods are you employing, generally speaking? I am not looking for collective answers, but individual ones.
Read more