What is the difference between Thief and Hunter?


What is the difference between Thief and Hunter?

Comments

  1. Patrick “Hirun” WNovember 28, 2015 at 5:44 AM

    Motivation. Greed or Survival.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Jeffrey HuesemanNovember 28, 2015 at 5:46 AM

    Ownership: if it's under the effective control of a person, if the object is taken, the taker is a thief, otherwise that person is a hunter.

    ReplyDelete
  3. The 6eminiNovember 28, 2015 at 5:55 AM

    The difference is defined by the ones who own power and influence. (ethic aspect of the question left aside because of lack of relevance). Truth hurts.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Sarah Rosen (Silencieux)November 28, 2015 at 6:55 AM

    The value of what is taken.

    If you steal a loaf of bread you're a thief. If you steal a country you're a king.

    If you kill something "less than" a person you're a hunter. If you kill a person, you're a (depending upon who you kill):

    Murderer.
    Hero.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Sarah Rosen (Silencieux)November 28, 2015 at 9:24 AM

    Hazel Vizion a hunter takes a life. Does that belong to him?

    ReplyDelete
  6. syko lilithNovember 28, 2015 at 10:22 AM

    Lmfao egg or chicken.

    ReplyDelete
  7. jason hartleyNovember 28, 2015 at 11:41 AM

    In a word ownership. The 6emini​ is correct those with power define "ownership".... " If I were asked to answer the following question: What is slavery? and I should answer in one word, It is murder!, my meaning would be understood at once. No extended argument would be required to show that the power to remove a man's mind, will, and personality, is the power of life and death, and that it makes a man a slave. It is murder. Why, then, to this other question: What is property? may I not likewise answer, It is robbery!, without the certainty of being misunderstood; the second proposition being no other than a transformation of the first?

    — Pierre-Joseph Proudhon

    ReplyDelete
  8. GabrielNovember 28, 2015 at 12:36 PM

    When we scold our cat for stealing food from the table, we often laugh at the idea of him answering "But I don't believe in prooopeeerty".

    For him it really is hunting.

    ReplyDelete
  9. jason hartleyNovember 28, 2015 at 12:59 PM

    Theft is to deprive one of property. Hunting is to deprive one of life...the cat is scavenging not hunting.

    ReplyDelete
  10. jason hartleyNovember 28, 2015 at 1:04 PM

    https://youtu.be/ZhgLEkgO0yo

    ReplyDelete
  11. jason hartleyNovember 28, 2015 at 1:07 PM

    When life is a pattern you can create at will. There is neither hunting nor theft. The eithics of it are what separates Shapers from N'zeer.

    ReplyDelete
  12. Pat “Saburai” ShenkNovember 28, 2015 at 9:34 PM

    They are one and the same...

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Essex members as you are aware essex and our member Lukas Lentz credibility , were attacked by the Global Data...

Essex members as you are aware essex and our member Lukas Lentz  credibility ,  were attacked by the Global Data Analysis Group. It is in our interest to show our unity as independent researchers now more than ever. Today earlier a post was made with me ( Hugo Neves ) as it's writer in order to make sure we had a fast reply out there. It is in our interest that we show our unity by signing our names to one post . The question I make is do we use the same post or a new one for this Also please today try and make posts or sign in the main Niantic one with the following hashtag #TrustLukas To show support for our colleague Lukas Lentz  https://plus.google.com/101577681173166935630/posts/XxjSGChLb5x
Read more

I am beginning to catalogue a list of Transdimensional Objects which appear to be inert artifacts, but, in fact,...

I am beginning to catalogue a list of Transdimensional Objects which appear to be inert artifacts, but, in fact, have actual technological capabilities when exposed to XM or present in a Nest.  Let us start with  the Shōnin Stone (which I believe to be broken at this point).  We know that it functions as something analogous to part of a circuit board or a key, depending on how you perceive it.  There is also Azmati's Dagger (or is it Alexander the Greats, I can't remember) that was used to test for simulacra. My feeling is that there are more such objects.  I am trying to catalogue them.   And as a thought experiment, what other objects must there be that have not yet been found?
Read more

so, general question.

so, general question... we know that ADA passed the "turing test", we also have many studies showing how the turing test can actually be gamed by very complex programming and in fact you can write programs to create the allusion of AI for many (the chinese room thought experiment).  At what point are we certain that she began acting on her own and has not been following a program and orders by someone else.  Are we certain that those orders that she delivered for Jarvis and others and even the Katalena pre Zurich encounters, were not done on the orders of some programming.  NOt to call ADA a gun, but how certain are we she is not?  How can we prove, beyond doubt, that she is truly a separate entity working on her own and not some other programming? I would like to call for the evidence and proof that ADA is a complete entity. That she is not following someone else's computer orders, that she has a consciousness (or not). http://niantic.schlarp.com/_media/investigation:cha...
Read more