The difference is defined by the ones who own power and influence. (ethic aspect of the question left aside because of lack of relevance). Truth hurts.
In a word ownership. The 6emini is correct those with power define "ownership".... " If I were asked to answer the following question: What is slavery? and I should answer in one word, It is murder!, my meaning would be understood at once. No extended argument would be required to show that the power to remove a man's mind, will, and personality, is the power of life and death, and that it makes a man a slave. It is murder. Why, then, to this other question: What is property? may I not likewise answer, It is robbery!, without the certainty of being misunderstood; the second proposition being no other than a transformation of the first?
Created a Wiki page for the RPG being played at the MAGNUS Reawakens event - please help add intel and share information to build the page (if not comfortable editing a wiki - please share intel here and it'll be added to the wiki page)!!!! Any info/images/etc. is useful. #13MAGNUSReawakens #MAGNUSReawaken #RPG Edgar Allan Wright flint dille https://niantic.schlarp.com/events:rpg https://niantic.schlarp.com/events:rpg
Motivation. Greed or Survival.
ReplyDeleteOwnership: if it's under the effective control of a person, if the object is taken, the taker is a thief, otherwise that person is a hunter.
ReplyDeleteThe difference is defined by the ones who own power and influence. (ethic aspect of the question left aside because of lack of relevance). Truth hurts.
ReplyDeleteThe value of what is taken.
ReplyDeleteIf you steal a loaf of bread you're a thief. If you steal a country you're a king.
If you kill something "less than" a person you're a hunter. If you kill a person, you're a (depending upon who you kill):
Murderer.
Hero.
Hazel Vizion a hunter takes a life. Does that belong to him?
ReplyDeleteLmfao egg or chicken.
ReplyDeleteIn a word ownership. The 6emini is correct those with power define "ownership".... " If I were asked to answer the following question: What is slavery? and I should answer in one word, It is murder!, my meaning would be understood at once. No extended argument would be required to show that the power to remove a man's mind, will, and personality, is the power of life and death, and that it makes a man a slave. It is murder. Why, then, to this other question: What is property? may I not likewise answer, It is robbery!, without the certainty of being misunderstood; the second proposition being no other than a transformation of the first?
ReplyDelete— Pierre-Joseph Proudhon
When we scold our cat for stealing food from the table, we often laugh at the idea of him answering "But I don't believe in prooopeeerty".
ReplyDeleteFor him it really is hunting.
Theft is to deprive one of property. Hunting is to deprive one of life...the cat is scavenging not hunting.
ReplyDeletehttps://youtu.be/ZhgLEkgO0yo
ReplyDeleteWhen life is a pattern you can create at will. There is neither hunting nor theft. The eithics of it are what separates Shapers from N'zeer.
ReplyDeleteThey are one and the same...
ReplyDelete