And while we are looking into the past, what happened to ADA's project over a year ago where she granted Agent...


And while we are looking into the past, what happened to ADA's project over a year ago where she granted Agent @PenFieldWild Level 17 access while experimenting with using Glyphs to ingress into the minds of humans? (And speaking of Agent @PenFieldWild, what happened to him?) Was the project a failure? A success?

Ingress​​​​​ Niantic Project​​​​​ Edgar Allan Wright​​​​​

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-r7KcB1BsFU&feature=youtube_gdata_player

#Ingress #NianticProject

Comments

  1. Rory DurkinNovember 12, 2015 at 2:46 PM

    One agent removed the patch from her scanner to begin a "new life in the agency" after seeing "concerning messages in the glyph game". A few others kept their patch despite similar reports of such messages, but were briefly (and for quite some time afterward) promoting the spread of "resistance-polarized" xm. No observed Level 17 agents. Failure? Success? Her true motives are uncertain as usual, but strange things were certainly afoot during this time.

    ReplyDelete
  2. David Timothy (Ianas)November 12, 2015 at 2:54 PM

    Looks like he's still hanging out with 67867967 AP...

    ReplyDelete
  3. Kosh TheRipper (KoshTheRipper)November 12, 2015 at 4:19 PM

    I haven't heard anything about Penfieldwild...

    ReplyDelete
  4. ERA 08November 12, 2015 at 4:30 PM

    Still awaiting for that Access Level. If it is really true. Ingress​ Niantic Project​ A Detection Algorithm​

    ReplyDelete
  5. Brian GNovember 13, 2015 at 2:38 PM

    Thank you!  I keep asking the same question for some time now

    ReplyDelete
  6. oneneednotbeachamberNovember 13, 2015 at 10:21 PM

    Same. Although it does seem to heavily bent towards the resistance. Perhaps things will change when the other researchers are captured. Who knows maybe the enlightened will capture ADA and both sides will be unlocked.

    ReplyDelete
  7. Brian GNovember 13, 2015 at 11:13 PM

    oneneednotbeachamber The Resistance is trying to free people from the portal network where the enlightened are trying to keep people imprisoned in them. 

    So what is my point?  This will be a Win, Win for the Resistance.

    enlightened win!  ADA stays with the n'zeer and becomes more powerful! 

    Resistances win!  ADA turns her self back on and tells us all about the n'zeer.

    ReplyDelete
  8. ERA 08April 14, 2017 at 8:24 PM

    Access Level 17, still not confirmed by NIA Ops Niantic Project Ingress A Detection Algorithm Klue S.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

so, general question.

so, general question... we know that ADA passed the "turing test", we also have many studies showing how the turing test can actually be gamed by very complex programming and in fact you can write programs to create the allusion of AI for many (the chinese room thought experiment).  At what point are we certain that she began acting on her own and has not been following a program and orders by someone else.  Are we certain that those orders that she delivered for Jarvis and others and even the Katalena pre Zurich encounters, were not done on the orders of some programming.  NOt to call ADA a gun, but how certain are we she is not?  How can we prove, beyond doubt, that she is truly a separate entity working on her own and not some other programming? I would like to call for the evidence and proof that ADA is a complete entity. That she is not following someone else's computer orders, that she has a consciousness (or not). http://niantic.schlarp.com/_media/investigation:cha...
Read more

Dear investigators, I have some questions for you.

Image
Dear investigators, I have some questions for you. What brings you here? What is it that you are investigating? Something in particular? Everything in general? Or are you merely following the story while making clever remarks from the side? And what are your results? What did you discover so far? Also, what methods are you employing, generally speaking? I am not looking for collective answers, but individual ones.
Read more