Where are the missing sensitives?

Where are the missing sensitives?  like Devra Bogdanovich  https://plus.google.com/u/0/+NianticProject/posts/Tk8sywh6maV

Comments

  1. JoJo StrattonOctober 8, 2015 at 4:58 AM

    why is Jarvis around?

    ReplyDelete
  2. JoJo StrattonOctober 8, 2015 at 5:09 AM

    So that means he is in play?  Also I liked the potential by Richard Jennings about the dots relating to the month/type of event

    ReplyDelete
  3. Richard JenningsOctober 8, 2015 at 5:11 AM

    Yik Sheng Lee​ his body was kept in that shed that the Acolyte was protecting...did it ever move and was it still there after the XM explosion? It's likely that Roland Jarvis​​ has been a simulacrum since Bowstring afterall

    ReplyDelete
  4. Kowit WongtrakoolOctober 8, 2015 at 5:55 AM

    In my opinion, the dot is important level of each character in story line and those characters never appear as Shard (except Jarvis).

    And the dot might be different score of each character in the Shard game.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

so, general question.

so, general question... we know that ADA passed the "turing test", we also have many studies showing how the turing test can actually be gamed by very complex programming and in fact you can write programs to create the allusion of AI for many (the chinese room thought experiment).  At what point are we certain that she began acting on her own and has not been following a program and orders by someone else.  Are we certain that those orders that she delivered for Jarvis and others and even the Katalena pre Zurich encounters, were not done on the orders of some programming.  NOt to call ADA a gun, but how certain are we she is not?  How can we prove, beyond doubt, that she is truly a separate entity working on her own and not some other programming? I would like to call for the evidence and proof that ADA is a complete entity. That she is not following someone else's computer orders, that she has a consciousness (or not). http://niantic.schlarp.com/_media/investigation:cha...
Read more

Dear investigators, I have some questions for you.

Image
Dear investigators, I have some questions for you. What brings you here? What is it that you are investigating? Something in particular? Everything in general? Or are you merely following the story while making clever remarks from the side? And what are your results? What did you discover so far? Also, what methods are you employing, generally speaking? I am not looking for collective answers, but individual ones.
Read more