I regret that I was unable to obtain a complete transcript.

I regret that I was unable to obtain a complete transcript. Any contributions which could assist in piercing the veil of comprehension would be appreciated. It would appear that Devra is aware of many individuals in the form of sentient data, wherever she is. I'm pretty sure this isn't what Hank experienced, given what descriptions he has put forth. The "poetic justice" of becoming what she feared is disturbing. Did she fear Shapers most? Is she then a Shaper?
https://youtu.be/p6Fi6N72Y9o

Comments

  1. Daniel Beaudoin (SK8ZION)April 9, 2015 at 8:17 PM

    One of the most creepy

    ReplyDelete
  2. Jim LaiApril 10, 2015 at 8:26 AM

    It's intriguing that Devra apparently warns that Jahan's lies will kill Hank. Is this a past or future event?

    ReplyDelete
  3. Peter BachmanApril 10, 2015 at 10:48 AM

    Lots of chaos.

    ReplyDelete
  4. GabrielApril 12, 2015 at 2:07 AM

    The First & Foremost, the blue and green Shapers are our thoughts and emotions.

    The losing of the host is the separation from the body, the red N'Zeer. Nature, red in tooth and claw. The Shapers and the N'Zeer are the result of this separation.

    Call our thoughts and emotions parasites of the body, we may. But another view is that all parasitism is symbiosis in disguise.

    The union of opposites, coincidentia oppositorum, is the great work of all mystical schools.

    The returning of the N'Zeer is the reunion with our bodies, with nature. And the fact that we fear this so much slightly disturbs me...

    Nevertheless, the eggshell is cracking :)

    ReplyDelete
  5. GabrielApril 12, 2015 at 8:07 AM

    The First & Foremost, yes he appears to have e perspective similar to mine.

    What is the glyph for 'Repair'?

    ReplyDelete
  6. Peter BachmanApril 12, 2015 at 8:29 AM

    A fellow agent complained to me that I was fielding wrong. I took a snapshot of Intel and pointed out that given the rules some of the lines were impossible since they crossed and the database was simply corrupt.

    He pointed out to me that the lines did not conflict in 4 dimensions.

    Here we have the coniunctio oppositorum at work and I think where the lines appear to cross and where they do not.

    ReplyDelete
  7. GabrielApril 12, 2015 at 9:16 AM

    Peter Bachman, just a few minutes ago I was reading about paraconsistent logic, where a statement can be both and false at the same time.

    ReplyDelete
  8. GabrielApril 12, 2015 at 2:14 PM

    Are God and Nature then at strife,
    That Nature lends such evil dreams?

    ReplyDelete
  9. Robert (MichaelSorens)April 12, 2015 at 8:04 PM

    No. She fears sentient data.

    ReplyDelete
  10. GabrielApril 13, 2015 at 12:02 AM

    All is sentient data.

    ReplyDelete
  11. JoJo StrattonApril 13, 2015 at 2:24 PM

    great work, has anyone done any other analysis, transcript or breakdown of frames?  I am adding links to the wiki.  Thanks again Jim Lai

    ReplyDelete
  12. syko lilithApril 23, 2015 at 12:12 AM

    Who is arecibo? Stopping her from doing what? What sentient data.

    ReplyDelete
  13. Jim LaiApril 23, 2015 at 4:17 AM

    In this video, Devra and Hank discuss an "Arecibo document". It appears related to 13MAGNUS.
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7v4P6pOghKs

    ReplyDelete
  14. syko lilithApril 23, 2015 at 6:37 AM

    Thanks Jim Lai​

    ReplyDelete
  15. Peter BachmanApril 23, 2015 at 7:16 AM

    Gab Android para consistent logic looks to be useful.
    Of course one needs the chops of formal logic first to see how it solves problems regarding paradoxes. Wish I had that.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

so, general question.

so, general question... we know that ADA passed the "turing test", we also have many studies showing how the turing test can actually be gamed by very complex programming and in fact you can write programs to create the allusion of AI for many (the chinese room thought experiment).  At what point are we certain that she began acting on her own and has not been following a program and orders by someone else.  Are we certain that those orders that she delivered for Jarvis and others and even the Katalena pre Zurich encounters, were not done on the orders of some programming.  NOt to call ADA a gun, but how certain are we she is not?  How can we prove, beyond doubt, that she is truly a separate entity working on her own and not some other programming? I would like to call for the evidence and proof that ADA is a complete entity. That she is not following someone else's computer orders, that she has a consciousness (or not). http://niantic.schlarp.com/_media/investigation:cha...
Read more

Dear investigators, I have some questions for you.

Image
Dear investigators, I have some questions for you. What brings you here? What is it that you are investigating? Something in particular? Everything in general? Or are you merely following the story while making clever remarks from the side? And what are your results? What did you discover so far? Also, what methods are you employing, generally speaking? I am not looking for collective answers, but individual ones.
Read more