so, general question... we know that ADA passed the "turing test", we also have many studies showing how the turing test can actually be gamed by very complex programming and in fact you can write programs to create the allusion of AI for many (the chinese room thought experiment). At what point are we certain that she began acting on her own and has not been following a program and orders by someone else. Are we certain that those orders that she delivered for Jarvis and others and even the Katalena pre Zurich encounters, were not done on the orders of some programming. NOt to call ADA a gun, but how certain are we she is not? How can we prove, beyond doubt, that she is truly a separate entity working on her own and not some other programming? I would like to call for the evidence and proof that ADA is a complete entity. That she is not following someone else's computer orders, that she has a consciousness (or not). http://niantic.schlarp.com/_media/investigation:cha...
This is quite fascinating. Explain more. Sanskrit has not been a field of study of mine, yet.
ReplyDeleteEdgar Allan Wright http://spokensanskrit.de/ says
ReplyDeletera = effecting, acquiring, possessing, giving, speed, fire, gold, heat, love, desire, brightness, splendour
ta = warrior, barbarian, thief, tail, hip, womb, breast, nectar, jewel, virtue
rata = sex, lust, copulation, sensuality, enjoyment, pleasure, amused, pleased, beloved, loved, gratified
Agent NFAMOU5 Enl/Res is another duality inside the Shaper side of the Shaper/N'Zeer duality.
ReplyDeleteJust like the 2 XM polarities (green/blue) are another duality inside the XM side of the XM/CM duality.
Mr. Lennon was obviously a highly shaped sensitive. I could argue his alignment either way, if, indeed he had one. I put him in the category of an Oracle of sorts. Not to mention an extreme outlier communicator.
ReplyDeleteThe First & Foremost Yes...there are many others like sneha...kaama...rati...preeti...prema etc etc...
ReplyDeleteAlso as the Gab Android put it... there are many root words for love (similar meaning to love too) and add that to make your own phrases. The way i learnt Sanskrit, only basis/root words matter...the actual words that Sanskrit has is infinite.... We have poets write the same meaning with different words to make it rhythmic and most of the times its adjectives like "might one" "invincible one" "courageous one" etc and compare them to some other object and create a new adjective
ReplyDeleteThanks Dinesh Gundu I didn't know about all that.
ReplyDeleteThe First & Foremost The way I understand it, rata and rati is erotic love.
ReplyDeleteThe First & Foremost, quite so.
ReplyDelete