H.

H. Richard Loeb, and before him Roland Jarvis have begun sounding the alarm about the artifacts. Resistance have captured 2- and three are about to be captured by Peru ENL. Do you believe the warnings?

I'm not so sure. If they are a danger, has the die has already been cast? If not, could this be the chance to do the impossible, to empower agents like Hubert Farlowe , Hank Johnson , and others to make a real difference?

Comments

  1. Mildred CadyAugust 16, 2014 at 5:41 PM

    The question is, if they present a danger, is it to humanity or those who are loosing or have lost their humanity due to XM?


    H. Richard Loeb's concern may be more for the effect that the artifacts would have on +ADA/Klue S. than on an everyday human, while Roland Jarvis would have to be careful of his resurrected existence.

    But if the artifacts could bring Hank Johnson back, that would be great. He's one of the few ENL aligned sensitives I know enough to feel that I can communicate with (some are too insane to reason with and the others are too quiet).

    ReplyDelete
  2. Typhoon JimAugust 16, 2014 at 8:34 PM

    I wish I knew what the warning was.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Ana Prados (Laria)August 17, 2014 at 1:49 AM

    For now what we have is a warning from Roland Jarvis  that is only a rumour on a NIA document and another one from H. Richard Loeb on a rushed post that was very different from his previous post.

    And as I see it, Klada's  plan is the most sensible one, another thing altogether is that we agree on who is the wrong hands to hold something like the artefacts.
    Probably the best case scenario would a equal number or artefacts on both factions, so none of them could abuse them.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

so, general question.

so, general question... we know that ADA passed the "turing test", we also have many studies showing how the turing test can actually be gamed by very complex programming and in fact you can write programs to create the allusion of AI for many (the chinese room thought experiment).  At what point are we certain that she began acting on her own and has not been following a program and orders by someone else.  Are we certain that those orders that she delivered for Jarvis and others and even the Katalena pre Zurich encounters, were not done on the orders of some programming.  NOt to call ADA a gun, but how certain are we she is not?  How can we prove, beyond doubt, that she is truly a separate entity working on her own and not some other programming? I would like to call for the evidence and proof that ADA is a complete entity. That she is not following someone else's computer orders, that she has a consciousness (or not). http://niantic.schlarp.com/_media/investigation:cha...
Read more

Dear investigators, I have some questions for you.

Image
Dear investigators, I have some questions for you. What brings you here? What is it that you are investigating? Something in particular? Everything in general? Or are you merely following the story while making clever remarks from the side? And what are your results? What did you discover so far? Also, what methods are you employing, generally speaking? I am not looking for collective answers, but individual ones.
Read more