so, general question... we know that ADA passed the "turing test", we also have many studies showing how the turing test can actually be gamed by very complex programming and in fact you can write programs to create the allusion of AI for many (the chinese room thought experiment). At what point are we certain that she began acting on her own and has not been following a program and orders by someone else. Are we certain that those orders that she delivered for Jarvis and others and even the Katalena pre Zurich encounters, were not done on the orders of some programming. NOt to call ADA a gun, but how certain are we she is not? How can we prove, beyond doubt, that she is truly a separate entity working on her own and not some other programming? I would like to call for the evidence and proof that ADA is a complete entity. That she is not following someone else's computer orders, that she has a consciousness (or not). http://niantic.schlarp.com/_media/investigation:cha...
Wow. That is disturbingly specific of Jarvis for once. Does this confirm him as the message sender?
ReplyDeleteThat doesn't look like it would be the handwriting of Jarvis. Little circles over the i's? Little loopy descenders on the g's? Looks like this was written by a tween girl, or someone trying to make it look like it was written by a tween girl.
ReplyDeleteIf Shapers are behind the message and are using JARVIS, there's no reason that they couldn't attempt to use multiple mediums to get their message through to us.
ReplyDeleteJim Lai Good point. This does corroborate his claim. I am curious why there are two different sets of writing though. The text on the front is a continuation of the documents found in Krakow.
ReplyDeleteWhat writing style(s) did Carrie Campbell exhibit?
ReplyDeleteCould more become clear if the Krakow documents are also assembled?