Jason Polzin give him some time, remember his relation with the Elephant is complicated rigth now. He will speak about it when he is ready for it. The fact that he has come back is already good news.
Thanks for the post.. H. Richard Loeb is right to say we should be cautious and that includes being cautious with him too.. But its nice to have him back.. ☺
Have to constantly remind ourselves to leave factional perceptions at the door. They're useless when looking for the truth. Great to see H. Richard Loeb among us again.
Essex members as you are aware essex and our member Lukas Lentz credibility , were attacked by the Global Data Analysis Group. It is in our interest to show our unity as independent researchers now more than ever. Today earlier a post was made with me ( Hugo Neves ) as it's writer in order to make sure we had a fast reply out there. It is in our interest that we show our unity by signing our names to one post . The question I make is do we use the same post or a new one for this Also please today try and make posts or sign in the main Niantic one with the following hashtag #TrustLukas To show support for our colleague Lukas Lentz https://plus.google.com/101577681173166935630/posts/XxjSGChLb5x
I am beginning to catalogue a list of Transdimensional Objects which appear to be inert artifacts, but, in fact, have actual technological capabilities when exposed to XM or present in a Nest. Let us start with the Shōnin Stone (which I believe to be broken at this point). We know that it functions as something analogous to part of a circuit board or a key, depending on how you perceive it. There is also Azmati's Dagger (or is it Alexander the Greats, I can't remember) that was used to test for simulacra. My feeling is that there are more such objects. I am trying to catalogue them. And as a thought experiment, what other objects must there be that have not yet been found?
so, general question... we know that ADA passed the "turing test", we also have many studies showing how the turing test can actually be gamed by very complex programming and in fact you can write programs to create the allusion of AI for many (the chinese room thought experiment). At what point are we certain that she began acting on her own and has not been following a program and orders by someone else. Are we certain that those orders that she delivered for Jarvis and others and even the Katalena pre Zurich encounters, were not done on the orders of some programming. NOt to call ADA a gun, but how certain are we she is not? How can we prove, beyond doubt, that she is truly a separate entity working on her own and not some other programming? I would like to call for the evidence and proof that ADA is a complete entity. That she is not following someone else's computer orders, that she has a consciousness (or not). http://niantic.schlarp.com/_media/investigation:cha...
so we are supposed to just "join him" like a trained dog? can't really do a successful investigation if you ignore the elephant in the room......
ReplyDeleteThank you for posting these.
ReplyDeleteJason Polzin give him some time, remember his relation with the Elephant is complicated rigth now.
ReplyDeleteHe will speak about it when he is ready for it. The fact that he has come back is already good news.
Thanks for the post.. H. Richard Loeb is right to say we should be cautious and that includes being cautious with him too.. But its nice to have him back.. ☺
ReplyDeleteI trust Loeb.
ReplyDeleteBut I will always be cautious with any information.
Great to see him back! Guys, what are the requirements to join the chat? I wanna dig deeper into the rabbit hole...
ReplyDeleteHave to constantly remind ourselves to leave factional perceptions at the door. They're useless when looking for the truth. Great to see H. Richard Loeb among us again.
ReplyDelete