Jason Polzin give him some time, remember his relation with the Elephant is complicated rigth now. He will speak about it when he is ready for it. The fact that he has come back is already good news.
Thanks for the post.. H. Richard Loeb is right to say we should be cautious and that includes being cautious with him too.. But its nice to have him back.. ☺
Have to constantly remind ourselves to leave factional perceptions at the door. They're useless when looking for the truth. Great to see H. Richard Loeb among us again.
So - throwing this out there to get discussion going. if there really is a G+ end coming - what should we do with the Operation Essex Community? How would we archive it? Where would we move to (Forum Boards are the ideal type of structure). Thoughts?
Essex members as you are aware essex and our member Lukas Lentz credibility , were attacked by the Global Data Analysis Group. It is in our interest to show our unity as independent researchers now more than ever. Today earlier a post was made with me ( Hugo Neves ) as it's writer in order to make sure we had a fast reply out there. It is in our interest that we show our unity by signing our names to one post . The question I make is do we use the same post or a new one for this Also please today try and make posts or sign in the main Niantic one with the following hashtag #TrustLukas To show support for our colleague Lukas Lentz https://plus.google.com/101577681173166935630/posts/XxjSGChLb5x
I am beginning to catalogue a list of Transdimensional Objects which appear to be inert artifacts, but, in fact, have actual technological capabilities when exposed to XM or present in a Nest. Let us start with the Shōnin Stone (which I believe to be broken at this point). We know that it functions as something analogous to part of a circuit board or a key, depending on how you perceive it. There is also Azmati's Dagger (or is it Alexander the Greats, I can't remember) that was used to test for simulacra. My feeling is that there are more such objects. I am trying to catalogue them. And as a thought experiment, what other objects must there be that have not yet been found?
so we are supposed to just "join him" like a trained dog? can't really do a successful investigation if you ignore the elephant in the room......
ReplyDeleteThank you for posting these.
ReplyDeleteJason Polzin give him some time, remember his relation with the Elephant is complicated rigth now.
ReplyDeleteHe will speak about it when he is ready for it. The fact that he has come back is already good news.
Thanks for the post.. H. Richard Loeb is right to say we should be cautious and that includes being cautious with him too.. But its nice to have him back.. ☺
ReplyDeleteI trust Loeb.
ReplyDeleteBut I will always be cautious with any information.
Great to see him back! Guys, what are the requirements to join the chat? I wanna dig deeper into the rabbit hole...
ReplyDeleteHave to constantly remind ourselves to leave factional perceptions at the door. They're useless when looking for the truth. Great to see H. Richard Loeb among us again.
ReplyDelete