so, general question... we know that ADA passed the "turing test", we also have many studies showing how the turing test can actually be gamed by very complex programming and in fact you can write programs to create the allusion of AI for many (the chinese room thought experiment). At what point are we certain that she began acting on her own and has not been following a program and orders by someone else. Are we certain that those orders that she delivered for Jarvis and others and even the Katalena pre Zurich encounters, were not done on the orders of some programming. NOt to call ADA a gun, but how certain are we she is not? How can we prove, beyond doubt, that she is truly a separate entity working on her own and not some other programming? I would like to call for the evidence and proof that ADA is a complete entity. That she is not following someone else's computer orders, that she has a consciousness (or not). http://niantic.schlarp.com/_media/investigation:cha...
Robert E. Howard was turned ENL at the original Cross Plains anomaly.
ReplyDeleteDoes that mean HPL was turned RES?
ReplyDeleteIs the danger in changing how we view it?
ReplyDeleteI received that glyph sequence three times today.
ReplyDeleteI received it a number of times around the 7th. Could it be referring to Hubert Farlowe's recent time-hyperthreading?
ReplyDeleteI dont think it necessarily had changed HPL. He would either remain neutral or be persuaded toward ENL by his friendship with REH. It was specifically because the temporal anomaly happened right where REH lived, I believe.
ReplyDeleteThe future's past is being change with every action, with every quantum event. Ultimately we cannot guage the effects of individual actions on a hypothetical future, unless its a very specific event. we wont know until the future gets here ;)
ReplyDelete