so, general question... we know that ADA passed the "turing test", we also have many studies showing how the turing test can actually be gamed by very complex programming and in fact you can write programs to create the allusion of AI for many (the chinese room thought experiment). At what point are we certain that she began acting on her own and has not been following a program and orders by someone else. Are we certain that those orders that she delivered for Jarvis and others and even the Katalena pre Zurich encounters, were not done on the orders of some programming. NOt to call ADA a gun, but how certain are we she is not? How can we prove, beyond doubt, that she is truly a separate entity working on her own and not some other programming? I would like to call for the evidence and proof that ADA is a complete entity. That she is not following someone else's computer orders, that she has a consciousness (or not). http://niantic.schlarp.com/_media/investigation:cha...
Just stick to it. Don't feel the need to justify yourself or make excuses when you can't update one day. Just make up a reason, if you really feel the need to provide one, or simply act as if nothing happened. You owe us all nothing, and we are (or should be) grateful for your work. Thanks again, #MuMu !
ReplyDelete^ that.
ReplyDeleteI have found your work extremely useful. I don't actually think you need to change a thing, unless you wanted to, in which case I'm sure the changes would be good ones and justified. The consistent quality of your reporting has earned you that measure of trust.
ReplyDeleteAs someone who didn't follow the plot from day 1 I find it very interesting and useful.
ReplyDeleteAnd, yeah, don't worry if you miss a day.
^all that.
ReplyDelete