Hubert Farlowe suggested we look deeper into the Doc.

Hubert Farlowe suggested we look deeper into the Doc.  Here are the screen grabs of all the frames in which a cloud or field appear.  They should be in order, if not,  I do have them numbered in the file name.




Comments

  1. Thomas Arteaga (Zynroch)May 16, 2014 at 8:17 AM

    Nice work!

    ReplyDelete
  2. Rory DurkinMay 16, 2014 at 8:23 AM

    Devra was in the presence of ADA for quite a long time now, with ADA often talking about guiding her and protecting her, makes me wonder if Klue isn't really the first successful merger.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Brent WerleinMay 16, 2014 at 8:26 AM

    I tried to manipulate the photos, but I don't have decent software.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Rory DurkinMay 16, 2014 at 8:30 AM

    Speaking of potential overlayed face, this also reminds me of the pink cern image that had ascemic writing added later on.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Brent WerleinMay 16, 2014 at 8:43 AM

    GIF of the images in sequential order has been added.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Jennifer Wolff (JennyWeb)May 16, 2014 at 8:44 AM

    Is it me or are her eyes appearing unusually dark?

    ReplyDelete
  7. João Rabaça TeixeiraMay 16, 2014 at 9:08 AM

    Stenography!!

    ReplyDelete
  8. Brent WerleinMay 16, 2014 at 9:13 AM

    I have uploaded more photos.  All photo manipulation was done in video with VLC.  A word seems to appear and I have tried to make it out Ch????d

    ReplyDelete
  9. Dean NMay 16, 2014 at 12:51 PM

    Looks like that word was in an oval. Possibly that belongs to a sign where she is at?

    ReplyDelete
  10. Krishna HammondMay 16, 2014 at 3:03 PM

    I may be hungover too, but I am certain the first letter is not a Ch. It is a D. It spells out Dalby. Ignore the strange squiggle to the left of the line. Also, the upside down A is a Y. EDIT: w orking on the document with the information. I  threw in a bit seeing "Chirality" fits. No luck so far.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

so, general question.

so, general question... we know that ADA passed the "turing test", we also have many studies showing how the turing test can actually be gamed by very complex programming and in fact you can write programs to create the allusion of AI for many (the chinese room thought experiment).  At what point are we certain that she began acting on her own and has not been following a program and orders by someone else.  Are we certain that those orders that she delivered for Jarvis and others and even the Katalena pre Zurich encounters, were not done on the orders of some programming.  NOt to call ADA a gun, but how certain are we she is not?  How can we prove, beyond doubt, that she is truly a separate entity working on her own and not some other programming? I would like to call for the evidence and proof that ADA is a complete entity. That she is not following someone else's computer orders, that she has a consciousness (or not). http://niantic.schlarp.com/_media/investigation:cha...
Read more

Dear investigators, I have some questions for you.

Image
Dear investigators, I have some questions for you. What brings you here? What is it that you are investigating? Something in particular? Everything in general? Or are you merely following the story while making clever remarks from the side? And what are your results? What did you discover so far? Also, what methods are you employing, generally speaking? I am not looking for collective answers, but individual ones.
Read more