so, general question... we know that ADA passed the "turing test", we also have many studies showing how the turing test can actually be gamed by very complex programming and in fact you can write programs to create the allusion of AI for many (the chinese room thought experiment). At what point are we certain that she began acting on her own and has not been following a program and orders by someone else. Are we certain that those orders that she delivered for Jarvis and others and even the Katalena pre Zurich encounters, were not done on the orders of some programming. NOt to call ADA a gun, but how certain are we she is not? How can we prove, beyond doubt, that she is truly a separate entity working on her own and not some other programming? I would like to call for the evidence and proof that ADA is a complete entity. That she is not following someone else's computer orders, that she has a consciousness (or not). http://niantic.schlarp.com/_media/investigation:cha...
I think we will find out when it arrives in Flagstaff this weekend.
ReplyDeleteThe green is more likely an infrared camera. If you slow down when it happens to Susanna Moyer, more details in the background become visiable.
ReplyDeleteHas anything ever come to light about a sound glyph? Sorry this question just popped into my head before hitting send, and may deserve it's own post.
Brent Werlein definitely post separately about sound glyphs - there has been a lot of discussion and potential, but I am not sure what forms of conculsions were reached and it would be good to revisit that topic!
ReplyDeleteSam Gan never thought about it being related to control fields, hmmmmm
ReplyDeleteJames Thirteen there is definitely "overlap" at times, but also cases where they diverged, at least physically. It is harder to track as NL did not post as many location checks as Hubert did, and using the time might be a pathway, but with the way g+ records time and trying to coordinate that... plus... Hubert Farlowe has mentioned time issues before so....
ReplyDelete