Looking back at the XM anomaly schedule, I discovered a pattern among the following series:
Looking back at the XM anomaly schedule, I discovered a pattern among the following series:
Operation #Cassandra - 13 events
Operation #13Magnus - 39 events
#Recursion XM anomaly- 26 events
Notice that these anomaly series are in factors of 13. How will this affect the scheduling of future anomalies? Feel free to post your thoughts here.
Operation #Cassandra - 13 events
Operation #13Magnus - 39 events
#Recursion XM anomaly- 26 events
Notice that these anomaly series are in factors of 13. How will this affect the scheduling of future anomalies? Feel free to post your thoughts here.
Interesting... Though it bugs me that it's not in order...
ReplyDeleteThis is in the order that they occured.
ReplyDeleteYeah, but I meant that the numbers aren't ordered as you'd expect them to be (13-26-39)
ReplyDeleteCould there be another pattern not seen? One that won't be seen until more data comes in?
ReplyDeletePerhaps it will decline again to a culminating event?
ReplyDeleteWhy not go up to 52 Devon Greer ? : )
ReplyDeleteSo I played arround with your numbers a little bit. We all know that 13, 26, and 39 are factors of 13. But so are the follwowing numbers:
ReplyDelete133926 (10302 * 13)
1339 (103 *13)
1326 (102*13)
132639 (10203 * 13)
I bolded the numbers in the correct order of the operation. Now if they keep with a pattern we should have a multiple of 13 and the next multiplyer should be 103020X. Replace the X with a number 1-9. Now if we do a substitution we would see that 8 and 9 would not work for the pattern as they would up the values to 1339*27*##. And since we have limited information to really say a pattern is happening, I think the next event will be the factor of 5. So there could be 65 events!
Now this pattern could be off. What about the events that predated #Cassandra? Could they be part of the pattern that we cannot see?
Jorge Pedrero no particular reason, other than at a cross faction meet up close to a year ago, someone did mention an endgame.
ReplyDelete