so, general question... we know that ADA passed the "turing test", we also have many studies showing how the turing test can actually be gamed by very complex programming and in fact you can write programs to create the allusion of AI for many (the chinese room thought experiment). At what point are we certain that she began acting on her own and has not been following a program and orders by someone else. Are we certain that those orders that she delivered for Jarvis and others and even the Katalena pre Zurich encounters, were not done on the orders of some programming. NOt to call ADA a gun, but how certain are we she is not? How can we prove, beyond doubt, that she is truly a separate entity working on her own and not some other programming? I would like to call for the evidence and proof that ADA is a complete entity. That she is not following someone else's computer orders, that she has a consciousness (or not). http://niantic.schlarp.com/_media/investigation:cha...
I don't think it's as simple as that. What happens if his body is damaged or destroyed?
ReplyDeleteDo we know where the body is? I thought it was IN the nest, which would basically kibosh any attempts to damage it.
ReplyDeleteTheoretically the body is still in the nest.… Maybe. When we asked Hank about it in Austin he said that it was safe.
ReplyDeleteJust because it is safe now, doesn't mean that it will always be so. Also the idea of having to reset every time you die and or every five'ish years, whichever comes first. Is very… Inconvenient at best. And pretty horrible when you stop and think about it.
Yeah, but don't worry: the artifacts are Shaper tech. Think about that. With sufficient study, anything can be reverse engineered....and Hank has all the time in the world. I do hope that Hank isn't being influenced by Jarvis, but he never struck me as someone who can fall prey to that sort of stuff. He's former PsyOps, that probably means he has strong mental barriers, especially if the cycle takes him back 2010 in memories each time. I mean, that's my assumption. If he becomes Tabula Rasa, that would be another story, but the writer of the Greek message made it seem as though he maintained some level of memory- literacy, and such. Procedural memories, such that the subject doesn't revert to infancy.
ReplyDeleteThink Dorian Gray, here.
ReplyDelete