so, general question... we know that ADA passed the "turing test", we also have many studies showing how the turing test can actually be gamed by very complex programming and in fact you can write programs to create the allusion of AI for many (the chinese room thought experiment). At what point are we certain that she began acting on her own and has not been following a program and orders by someone else. Are we certain that those orders that she delivered for Jarvis and others and even the Katalena pre Zurich encounters, were not done on the orders of some programming. NOt to call ADA a gun, but how certain are we she is not? How can we prove, beyond doubt, that she is truly a separate entity working on her own and not some other programming? I would like to call for the evidence and proof that ADA is a complete entity. That she is not following someone else's computer orders, that she has a consciousness (or not). http://niantic.schlarp.com/_media/investigation:cha...
Done Mark Sison . I also read your question earlier, but I haven't received an official line on which set of questions take priority. Since the set posted in the newsletter are a sampling of the set posted here, it would seem that the larger set are more worthy for judging quality. Just my opinion.
ReplyDeleteJose Ramirez noted, I agree that we should accept new recruits based on the answers given for all questions.
ReplyDeleteThank you both
ReplyDeletewelcome Ammaniel Manny Medina
ReplyDeleteWelcome to the community Ammaniel Manny Medina!
ReplyDeleteThanks everyone so let me know what I can do to contribute to this community
ReplyDelete