so, general question... we know that ADA passed the "turing test", we also have many studies showing how the turing test can actually be gamed by very complex programming and in fact you can write programs to create the allusion of AI for many (the chinese room thought experiment). At what point are we certain that she began acting on her own and has not been following a program and orders by someone else. Are we certain that those orders that she delivered for Jarvis and others and even the Katalena pre Zurich encounters, were not done on the orders of some programming. NOt to call ADA a gun, but how certain are we she is not? How can we prove, beyond doubt, that she is truly a separate entity working on her own and not some other programming? I would like to call for the evidence and proof that ADA is a complete entity. That she is not following someone else's computer orders, that she has a consciousness (or not). http://niantic.schlarp.com/_media/investigation:cha...
There is clear evidence that KlADA is... not right... from watching her videos. It's like ADA is digging around trying to find the right button to hit to get her to talk instead of crying, chortling or babbling.
ReplyDeleteEvolution and symbiosis is difficult even at the millennial scale - even moreso when the #ingress of the shapers makes it necessary for that process to be accelerated.
ReplyDeleteevolution? mechanical "evolution" for humans? i sense hypocrisy, here.
ReplyDeleteThat is the point Porelain. It is the same trope, just a different side has to struggle with thi kind of delima, if they choose to play based on story motives.
ReplyDeleteIf you don't know what a "trope" is, it is worth knowing literary tools to see the ethical grey areas and other situations being written for the characters.
ReplyDeleteIt only makes sense. The last arc was about Jarvis and his nature. This one will surely ask the same questions about ADA.
ReplyDeleteIt is a different angle from which to explore the mystery of XM.
I've been looking into Ada, just in the world, and how its been used. I've found some odd documents. That as a language it's been used for AI expert systems going back at least into the early 80's. even found a report from a researcher as Carnegie Melon for the DOD stating that AI was possible using Ada, here is a link http://resources.sei.cmu.edu/asset_files/TechnicalReport/1994_005_001_16298.pdf
ReplyDeletethen I found this other pdf about an Ada exibit in 02
http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.112.5303&rep=rep1&type=pdf
I know there would be much use of the term Ada due to the connection of the name to base computing concepts, but the connection to AI at a deep fundamental system level is intriguing