Hank surrounded by resistance agents who tried to get him on the dark side

Hank surrounded by resistance agents who tried to get him on the dark side

Comments

  1. Lukas LentzDecember 21, 2013 at 2:07 PM

    Dont forget:

    He expresses dislike but doesn't give a reason. Ask him this for brownie points "what is the basis for his cryptic antimagnus statement." See if he is willing to elaborate on that. Lol
    If he asks you to explain simply say "Am Not Terminated. In Motion. Arrive Germany. Not Until Saturday."
    If he looks at you weird with out an proper explanation say "broken English by native tongue, tends to have dual meanings. The you read each word by starting at the first letter.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Mike WissingerDecember 21, 2013 at 2:07 PM

    Hank Johnson doesn't choose enemies based on simple labels. Living on the edge one never knows where he might need a friend.

    ReplyDelete
  3. chris meredithDecember 21, 2013 at 2:07 PM

    He loves it

    ReplyDelete
  4. Axel Lorenzen-Zabel (oeLLph)December 21, 2013 at 2:24 PM

    Lukas Lentz he's tired and now off duty... So no more news from Hank m( sorry but nevertheless I tried....

    ReplyDelete
  5. flint dilleDecember 21, 2013 at 2:36 PM

    I heard he was kind of out-of-it.  What does, 'Am Not Terminated I Motion Arrive Germany Not Until Saturday' mean, anyway?

    ReplyDelete
  6. Peter “Anlashok” GerresheimDecember 21, 2013 at 3:55 PM

    flint dille It's a simple hidden message. The first letters of each word spell out ANTIMAGNUS.

    ReplyDelete
  7. Michael BramnikDecember 21, 2013 at 5:44 PM

    There's always a possibility that he's pretending to be brainwashed for his own safety, and the "ANTIMAGNUS" was a code to tell us that... (kind of an obvious code, regardless of who/what it was for though...)

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Essex members as you are aware essex and our member Lukas Lentz credibility , were attacked by the Global Data...

Essex members as you are aware essex and our member Lukas Lentz  credibility ,  were attacked by the Global Data Analysis Group. It is in our interest to show our unity as independent researchers now more than ever. Today earlier a post was made with me ( Hugo Neves ) as it's writer in order to make sure we had a fast reply out there. It is in our interest that we show our unity by signing our names to one post . The question I make is do we use the same post or a new one for this Also please today try and make posts or sign in the main Niantic one with the following hashtag #TrustLukas To show support for our colleague Lukas Lentz  https://plus.google.com/101577681173166935630/posts/XxjSGChLb5x
Read more

I am beginning to catalogue a list of Transdimensional Objects which appear to be inert artifacts, but, in fact,...

I am beginning to catalogue a list of Transdimensional Objects which appear to be inert artifacts, but, in fact, have actual technological capabilities when exposed to XM or present in a Nest.  Let us start with  the Shōnin Stone (which I believe to be broken at this point).  We know that it functions as something analogous to part of a circuit board or a key, depending on how you perceive it.  There is also Azmati's Dagger (or is it Alexander the Greats, I can't remember) that was used to test for simulacra. My feeling is that there are more such objects.  I am trying to catalogue them.   And as a thought experiment, what other objects must there be that have not yet been found?
Read more

so, general question.

so, general question... we know that ADA passed the "turing test", we also have many studies showing how the turing test can actually be gamed by very complex programming and in fact you can write programs to create the allusion of AI for many (the chinese room thought experiment).  At what point are we certain that she began acting on her own and has not been following a program and orders by someone else.  Are we certain that those orders that she delivered for Jarvis and others and even the Katalena pre Zurich encounters, were not done on the orders of some programming.  NOt to call ADA a gun, but how certain are we she is not?  How can we prove, beyond doubt, that she is truly a separate entity working on her own and not some other programming? I would like to call for the evidence and proof that ADA is a complete entity. That she is not following someone else's computer orders, that she has a consciousness (or not). http://niantic.schlarp.com/_media/investigation:cha...
Read more