I only just noticed this while watching from my computer at work.


I only just noticed this while watching from my computer at work.  Anyone else notice this annotation?  Any ideas what it means?

Bob Thomas

Comments

  1. Mustafa SaidNovember 28, 2013 at 3:37 PM

    My friend, you're not the only one. Look at this: https://plus.google.com/101807696742019624768/posts/azvs6cbinTE


    These annotations have been injected into the videos. Not all of them have them. Mostly earlier ones that most people don't watch anymore unless they're new and were recommended to watch them in order to help catch themselves up. I made a couple of notes on locations. I'd read the comments as well-they sure help.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Nave TalNovember 28, 2013 at 3:39 PM

    If only I turned the annotations the firaf time I watched the video... thst was a passcode and it's already fully redeemed. .

    ReplyDelete
  3. FevNovember 28, 2013 at 3:41 PM

    Someone is trying to get items to our scanners... Who is the hacker behind these attacks at the Ingress report?

    ReplyDelete
  4. Glenn Morgan (stickus)November 28, 2013 at 3:43 PM

    So there are other new annotations in previous Ingress Reports?

    ReplyDelete
  5. wyman wongNovember 28, 2013 at 3:43 PM

    Passcodes!

    ReplyDelete
  6. FevNovember 28, 2013 at 3:44 PM

    They come up from time to time. Two this week.

    ReplyDelete
  7. Mustafa SaidNovember 28, 2013 at 3:46 PM

    Glenn Morgan yep. They're in episodes very old, dating as far back as before Bowstring. Maybe even further.

    ReplyDelete
  8. Hugo NevesDecember 1, 2013 at 11:27 AM

    I wouldn't put too much thought into the annotations. They are merely passcode puzzles. They tended to be more invisible in the past but with the changes of Youtube they are now more visible.
     For more info on the stuff hidden in this video
    http://niantic.schlarp.com/investigation:videos:ingressreport?&#episode_36_-_jarvis_shards_activity_surges

    ReplyDelete
  9. Mustafa SaidDecember 1, 2013 at 11:32 AM

    Yo Hugo Neves Thanks!

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Essex members as you are aware essex and our member Lukas Lentz credibility , were attacked by the Global Data...

Essex members as you are aware essex and our member Lukas Lentz  credibility ,  were attacked by the Global Data Analysis Group. It is in our interest to show our unity as independent researchers now more than ever. Today earlier a post was made with me ( Hugo Neves ) as it's writer in order to make sure we had a fast reply out there. It is in our interest that we show our unity by signing our names to one post . The question I make is do we use the same post or a new one for this Also please today try and make posts or sign in the main Niantic one with the following hashtag #TrustLukas To show support for our colleague Lukas Lentz  https://plus.google.com/101577681173166935630/posts/XxjSGChLb5x
Read more

I am beginning to catalogue a list of Transdimensional Objects which appear to be inert artifacts, but, in fact,...

I am beginning to catalogue a list of Transdimensional Objects which appear to be inert artifacts, but, in fact, have actual technological capabilities when exposed to XM or present in a Nest.  Let us start with  the Shōnin Stone (which I believe to be broken at this point).  We know that it functions as something analogous to part of a circuit board or a key, depending on how you perceive it.  There is also Azmati's Dagger (or is it Alexander the Greats, I can't remember) that was used to test for simulacra. My feeling is that there are more such objects.  I am trying to catalogue them.   And as a thought experiment, what other objects must there be that have not yet been found?
Read more

so, general question.

so, general question... we know that ADA passed the "turing test", we also have many studies showing how the turing test can actually be gamed by very complex programming and in fact you can write programs to create the allusion of AI for many (the chinese room thought experiment).  At what point are we certain that she began acting on her own and has not been following a program and orders by someone else.  Are we certain that those orders that she delivered for Jarvis and others and even the Katalena pre Zurich encounters, were not done on the orders of some programming.  NOt to call ADA a gun, but how certain are we she is not?  How can we prove, beyond doubt, that she is truly a separate entity working on her own and not some other programming? I would like to call for the evidence and proof that ADA is a complete entity. That she is not following someone else's computer orders, that she has a consciousness (or not). http://niantic.schlarp.com/_media/investigation:cha...
Read more