so, general question... we know that ADA passed the "turing test", we also have many studies showing how the turing test can actually be gamed by very complex programming and in fact you can write programs to create the allusion of AI for many (the chinese room thought experiment). At what point are we certain that she began acting on her own and has not been following a program and orders by someone else. Are we certain that those orders that she delivered for Jarvis and others and even the Katalena pre Zurich encounters, were not done on the orders of some programming. NOt to call ADA a gun, but how certain are we she is not? How can we prove, beyond doubt, that she is truly a separate entity working on her own and not some other programming? I would like to call for the evidence and proof that ADA is a complete entity. That she is not following someone else's computer orders, that she has a consciousness (or not). http://niantic.schlarp.com/_media/investigation:cha...
Agreed.
ReplyDeleteI feel like we still haven't gained the legitimacy necessary for people to truly follow us
ReplyDeleteBiggest problem is they want in, but are not willing to take the test. A shame, but if they can't do that much, they don't have much value.
ReplyDeleteYeah, I keep having that problem. I send out feelers but then people never get back to me with test answers.
ReplyDeletePersonally I blame the structure of tagging people in posts on G+ for it (on mobile there is no good way to make those show up, when in fact they can be very important)
Most of the people in my area are more... shall we say, "boots on the ground"; they're more interested in fieldwork and tactics than observation and analysis.
ReplyDelete