A curious remark from an agent in the field.

A curious remark from an agent in the field. I will try to get more information, but I fear s/he may already have deactivated their scanner.

Comments

  1. Rory DurkinNovember 20, 2013 at 7:05 AM

    /sub?

    ReplyDelete
  2. Paul Gettle (radwolf76)November 20, 2013 at 7:23 AM

    I'd hate to get the bill for those roaming charges.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Martin BrennerNovember 20, 2013 at 7:46 AM

    texting? But obviously not in Ingress because the agent would not have their scanner installed when getting the message. So SMS or G+, or simply an e-mail?

    ReplyDelete
  4. Drew DonderoNovember 20, 2013 at 8:16 AM

    Is it a RedX phone?

    ReplyDelete
  5. Allen Rines (Kzanol)November 20, 2013 at 8:17 AM

    Martin Brenner Well, if you've given Google your mobile number for security purposes, it would be possible.  Kind of weird, though.  Not like there's any shortage of players, with so many new ones coming online now.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Michelle ENovember 20, 2013 at 8:29 AM

    That is curious. But also possibly this person had given their number to a fellow player who got desperate for help with something.

    ReplyDelete
  7. Brendan McKelvyNovember 20, 2013 at 8:42 AM

    I don't think Google would send "spam" messages to those who aren't playing.  Sure, they have this information because of the account association between devices, but why send texts, email would be easier.

    ReplyDelete
  8. Rory DurkinNovember 20, 2013 at 8:43 AM

    Do you know him / her?

    ReplyDelete
  9. Michelle ENovember 20, 2013 at 8:44 AM

    They would need players to opt-in for texts also I would think.

    ReplyDelete
  10. Drew DonderoNovember 20, 2013 at 8:45 AM

    I would like to see the actual texts/number etc

    ReplyDelete
  11. Rory DurkinNovember 20, 2013 at 8:48 AM

    LOL, ok, so it's not Jarvis sending people messages via RedX... dang!

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

so, general question.

so, general question... we know that ADA passed the "turing test", we also have many studies showing how the turing test can actually be gamed by very complex programming and in fact you can write programs to create the allusion of AI for many (the chinese room thought experiment).  At what point are we certain that she began acting on her own and has not been following a program and orders by someone else.  Are we certain that those orders that she delivered for Jarvis and others and even the Katalena pre Zurich encounters, were not done on the orders of some programming.  NOt to call ADA a gun, but how certain are we she is not?  How can we prove, beyond doubt, that she is truly a separate entity working on her own and not some other programming? I would like to call for the evidence and proof that ADA is a complete entity. That she is not following someone else's computer orders, that she has a consciousness (or not). http://niantic.schlarp.com/_media/investigation:cha...
Read more

Dear investigators, I have some questions for you.

Image
Dear investigators, I have some questions for you. What brings you here? What is it that you are investigating? Something in particular? Everything in general? Or are you merely following the story while making clever remarks from the side? And what are your results? What did you discover so far? Also, what methods are you employing, generally speaking? I am not looking for collective answers, but individual ones.
Read more