so, general question... we know that ADA passed the "turing test", we also have many studies showing how the turing test can actually be gamed by very complex programming and in fact you can write programs to create the allusion of AI for many (the chinese room thought experiment). At what point are we certain that she began acting on her own and has not been following a program and orders by someone else. Are we certain that those orders that she delivered for Jarvis and others and even the Katalena pre Zurich encounters, were not done on the orders of some programming. NOt to call ADA a gun, but how certain are we she is not? How can we prove, beyond doubt, that she is truly a separate entity working on her own and not some other programming? I would like to call for the evidence and proof that ADA is a complete entity. That she is not following someone else's computer orders, that she has a consciousness (or not). http://niantic.schlarp.com/_media/investigation:cha...
I have always interpreted it as "Through the Light"/"Path of Light" and "Through the Darkness"/"Path of Dark"
ReplyDelete'Through the Light' and now 'Into the Darkness'.... I am guessing someone is going to die.
Alguém já morreu e ressucitou para nosso bem, a 2016 anos atrás afinal a história não começa depois do ingress ela já exitia só não fora revelada até o ano 1.
ReplyDeleteI suddenly realized that N was also how you inputted the color back when it was single digit. Because B was the color blue.
ReplyDeletehttps://books.google.com.hk/books?id=C16OSPmzzoUC&pg=PA374&lpg=PA374&dq=red+r+blue+b+green+g+black+n&source=bl&ots=YlIl8ZIUYW&sig=y043--xJngJBsNqU7LV3I3GapaM&hl=en&sa=X&redir_esc=y#v=onepage&q=red%20r%20blue%20b%20green%20g%20black%20n&f=false
books.google.com.hk - DBASE - From the Dot Prompt