so, general question... we know that ADA passed the "turing test", we also have many studies showing how the turing test can actually be gamed by very complex programming and in fact you can write programs to create the allusion of AI for many (the chinese room thought experiment). At what point are we certain that she began acting on her own and has not been following a program and orders by someone else. Are we certain that those orders that she delivered for Jarvis and others and even the Katalena pre Zurich encounters, were not done on the orders of some programming. NOt to call ADA a gun, but how certain are we she is not? How can we prove, beyond doubt, that she is truly a separate entity working on her own and not some other programming? I would like to call for the evidence and proof that ADA is a complete entity. That she is not following someone else's computer orders, that she has a consciousness (or not). http://niantic.schlarp.com/_media/investigation:cha...
Wow!
ReplyDeleteI prefer to think Carrie is free from all the conflict between N'zeer and Shaper, Resistance and Enlightened. She is part of the true Ultimate.
ReplyDeleteAnd that's a nice mix!
The First & Foremost conflict isn't a desired state, but a means to a desired state. I think all Carrie ever wanted was to understand. Her manner of death hopefully preserved her independence.
ReplyDeleteThe First & Foremost For me, it's the means to the end, not just the end.
ReplyDeleteThe First & Foremost I agree. I am enlightened because I think the means being used by the Shapers are more appropriate than what I have learned of the N'zeer.
ReplyDeleteNote that that doesn't mean I support 13Magnus. They may share the destination, and perhaps the means, but aren't my guides or leader.
I would like to know that as well. The First & Foremost
ReplyDelete