Faces like this go all the way back into antiquity, to some of the earliest portrayals of gods and they go up to current thought with the face created by merging the Resistance and Enlightened symbols.
now that I've looked into them, it does bear a certain resemblance to some Aztec masks... but I have to say my first impression was... "cthulhu?"... and I see I wasn't the only one https://plus.google.com/+FevgamesNet28/posts/bqyCCJLhs4X
Well it would certainly fit, a dead deity that's a mix of human, octopus and dragon shape that waits dreaming (in his House in R'lyeh) Is N'zeer just another of it's names and are we going to wake it up?
Essex members as you are aware essex and our member Lukas Lentz credibility , were attacked by the Global Data Analysis Group. It is in our interest to show our unity as independent researchers now more than ever. Today earlier a post was made with me ( Hugo Neves ) as it's writer in order to make sure we had a fast reply out there. It is in our interest that we show our unity by signing our names to one post . The question I make is do we use the same post or a new one for this Also please today try and make posts or sign in the main Niantic one with the following hashtag #TrustLukas To show support for our colleague Lukas Lentz https://plus.google.com/101577681173166935630/posts/XxjSGChLb5x
I am beginning to catalogue a list of Transdimensional Objects which appear to be inert artifacts, but, in fact, have actual technological capabilities when exposed to XM or present in a Nest. Let us start with the Shōnin Stone (which I believe to be broken at this point). We know that it functions as something analogous to part of a circuit board or a key, depending on how you perceive it. There is also Azmati's Dagger (or is it Alexander the Greats, I can't remember) that was used to test for simulacra. My feeling is that there are more such objects. I am trying to catalogue them. And as a thought experiment, what other objects must there be that have not yet been found?
so, general question... we know that ADA passed the "turing test", we also have many studies showing how the turing test can actually be gamed by very complex programming and in fact you can write programs to create the allusion of AI for many (the chinese room thought experiment). At what point are we certain that she began acting on her own and has not been following a program and orders by someone else. Are we certain that those orders that she delivered for Jarvis and others and even the Katalena pre Zurich encounters, were not done on the orders of some programming. NOt to call ADA a gun, but how certain are we she is not? How can we prove, beyond doubt, that she is truly a separate entity working on her own and not some other programming? I would like to call for the evidence and proof that ADA is a complete entity. That she is not following someone else's computer orders, that she has a consciousness (or not). http://niantic.schlarp.com/_media/investigation:cha...
To me It most resembles a jack from a deck of cards but mirrored
ReplyDeleteFaces like this go all the way back into antiquity, to some of the earliest portrayals of gods and they go up to current thought with the face created by merging the Resistance and Enlightened symbols.
ReplyDeleteI actually meant as I've laid it out... upside down... a single face (mask?) with big flat teeth, wide spaced eyes, prominent brow ridges...
ReplyDeleteThe Ghost Dance picture.
ReplyDeleteIt's got the look. The Innsmouth look.
ReplyDeleteThis is same way i felt about it. like a tiki mask or something... it feels familiar but i cant place it.
ReplyDeletenow that I've looked into them, it does bear a certain resemblance to some Aztec masks... but I have to say my first impression was... "cthulhu?"... and I see I wasn't the only one https://plus.google.com/+FevgamesNet28/posts/bqyCCJLhs4X
ReplyDeleteWell it would certainly fit, a dead deity that's a mix of human, octopus and dragon shape that waits dreaming (in his House in R'lyeh)
ReplyDeleteIs N'zeer just another of it's names and are we going to wake it up?