Lou Kohn Here's another one to add to the list.
Lou Kohn Here's another one to add to the list.
So - throwing this out there to get discussion going.
So - throwing this out there to get discussion going. if there really is a G+ end coming - what should we do with the Operation Essex Community? How would we archive it? Where would we move to (Forum Boards are the ideal type of structure). Thoughts?
Which are still needed?
ReplyDeleteADA Refactor, Power Cube, and XMP from what I understand.
ReplyDeleteDang this thing blatently hints at higher level Rezzos
ReplyDeletefr
ReplyDeleteAbsolutely wonderful thank you Paul Gettle !
ReplyDelete+shi zhao Single use codes usually are.
ReplyDeleteI've been trying to collect a full set for a display box for ages.
ReplyDeleteI have to say I wish they would release high res graphics for these resonators. I like the opaque look to the resonator walls more than the solid look we currently have. (I understand why they are probably not in the scanner though).
ReplyDeleteWhat does HQB stand for in the lower left corner on the description side of the card
ReplyDeleteIt's "HQs", and shows the headquarters of the developer.
ReplyDeleteThis is great! Does anyone know if we've heard the phrase "frequency modulation" in terms of XM? If not, it definitely lends more evidence to theories that XM has both particle and wave properties. Also, it never occurred to me to think of XM alignment as part of a frequency spectrum....but it makes a LOT of sense. Green light is a certain range of wavelengths. Same with Blue. But more interesting is on the EM spectrum, different frequencies are reserved and allocated, as only so much bandwidth is present in the air. (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bandwidth_allocation) Could this be why NIA OPS specified the "top" field in a multi-faction multi-layer field is the one that counts? Its possible there is only so much XM "bandwidth", and opposing fields cause destructive interference, eliminating the effects of "lower" fields.
ReplyDelete