Lou Kohn Here's another one to add to the list.


Lou Kohn Here's another one to add to the list.

Comments

  1. FevDecember 16, 2013 at 7:33 AM

    Which are still needed?

    ReplyDelete
  2. Paul Gettle (radwolf76)December 16, 2013 at 7:36 AM

    ADA Refactor, Power Cube, and XMP from what I understand.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Daniel Beaudoin (SK8ZION)December 16, 2013 at 7:57 AM

    Dang this thing blatently hints at higher level Rezzos

    ReplyDelete
  4. shi zhaoDecember 16, 2013 at 8:09 AM

    fr

    ReplyDelete
  5. LouDecember 16, 2013 at 8:12 AM

    Absolutely wonderful thank you Paul Gettle !

    ReplyDelete
  6. Paul Gettle (radwolf76)December 16, 2013 at 8:35 AM

    +shi zhao Single use codes usually are.

    ReplyDelete
  7. Typhoon JimDecember 16, 2013 at 10:08 AM

    I've been trying to collect a full set for a display box for ages.

    ReplyDelete
  8. Dean NDecember 16, 2013 at 10:10 AM

    I have to say I wish they would release high res graphics for these resonators. I like the opaque look to the resonator walls more than the solid look we currently have. (I understand why they are probably not in the scanner though).

    ReplyDelete
  9. Brendan McKelvyDecember 16, 2013 at 11:37 AM

    What does HQB stand for in the lower left corner on the description side of the card

    ReplyDelete
  10. Typhoon JimDecember 16, 2013 at 11:38 AM

    It's "HQs", and shows the headquarters of the developer.

    ReplyDelete
  11. Krishna HammondDecember 16, 2013 at 1:53 PM

    This is great! Does anyone know if we've heard the phrase "frequency modulation" in terms of XM? If not, it definitely lends more evidence to theories that XM has both particle and wave properties. Also, it never occurred to me to think of XM alignment as part of a frequency spectrum....but it makes a LOT of sense. Green light is a certain range of wavelengths. Same with Blue. But more interesting is on the EM spectrum, different frequencies are reserved and allocated, as only so much bandwidth is present in the air. (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bandwidth_allocation) Could this be why NIA OPS specified the "top" field in a multi-faction multi-layer field is the one that counts? Its possible there is only so much XM "bandwidth", and opposing fields cause destructive interference, eliminating the effects of "lower" fields.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Essex members as you are aware essex and our member Lukas Lentz credibility , were attacked by the Global Data...

Essex members as you are aware essex and our member Lukas Lentz  credibility ,  were attacked by the Global Data Analysis Group. It is in our interest to show our unity as independent researchers now more than ever. Today earlier a post was made with me ( Hugo Neves ) as it's writer in order to make sure we had a fast reply out there. It is in our interest that we show our unity by signing our names to one post . The question I make is do we use the same post or a new one for this Also please today try and make posts or sign in the main Niantic one with the following hashtag #TrustLukas To show support for our colleague Lukas Lentz  https://plus.google.com/101577681173166935630/posts/XxjSGChLb5x
Read more

I am beginning to catalogue a list of Transdimensional Objects which appear to be inert artifacts, but, in fact,...

I am beginning to catalogue a list of Transdimensional Objects which appear to be inert artifacts, but, in fact, have actual technological capabilities when exposed to XM or present in a Nest.  Let us start with  the Shōnin Stone (which I believe to be broken at this point).  We know that it functions as something analogous to part of a circuit board or a key, depending on how you perceive it.  There is also Azmati's Dagger (or is it Alexander the Greats, I can't remember) that was used to test for simulacra. My feeling is that there are more such objects.  I am trying to catalogue them.   And as a thought experiment, what other objects must there be that have not yet been found?
Read more

so, general question.

so, general question... we know that ADA passed the "turing test", we also have many studies showing how the turing test can actually be gamed by very complex programming and in fact you can write programs to create the allusion of AI for many (the chinese room thought experiment).  At what point are we certain that she began acting on her own and has not been following a program and orders by someone else.  Are we certain that those orders that she delivered for Jarvis and others and even the Katalena pre Zurich encounters, were not done on the orders of some programming.  NOt to call ADA a gun, but how certain are we she is not?  How can we prove, beyond doubt, that she is truly a separate entity working on her own and not some other programming? I would like to call for the evidence and proof that ADA is a complete entity. That she is not following someone else's computer orders, that she has a consciousness (or not). http://niantic.schlarp.com/_media/investigation:cha...
Read more