Sources detected a large XM discharge in Afghanistan, directly corresponding to the MOAB ordinance.

Originally shared by Scheurmann R. (esistance)

Sources detected a large XM discharge in Afghanistan, directly corresponding to the MOAB ordinance. At this time, I am unable to determine if that was caused by the bomb, or if it was the bomb. Either is equally possible.

https://mobile.nytimes.com/2017/04/13/world/asia/moab-mother-of-all-bombs-afghanistan.html
https://mobile.nytimes.com/2017/04/13/world/asia/moab-mother-of-all-bombs-afghanistan.html

Comments

  1. Typhoon JimApril 13, 2017 at 7:37 PM

    What you're telling me is that somebody set up us the bomb and we get signal.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Sven W (P2063)April 13, 2017 at 10:16 PM

    Compare the largest known non nuclear bomb to a fictional game xm discharge? Not funny.

    ReplyDelete
  3. JTApril 16, 2017 at 8:03 AM

    Perhaps in poor taste, but his post correlates with the RE: 13 Magnus Awakens material discussing the influence of Game States.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Typhoon JimApril 16, 2017 at 7:02 PM

    A better question is whether we have a chance to survive and should thus make our time

    ReplyDelete
  5. JTApril 16, 2017 at 7:26 PM

    Tomorrow is guaranteed to no one and we should all make the most of the time we have. To the specific point it was most definitely a signal not to us, but rather Northern neighbors. Should the game-state in the universe lead us down an unpleasant path then life will be far less enjoyable. Use all your old gift cards

    ReplyDelete
  6. Typhoon JimApril 16, 2017 at 8:02 PM

    For great justice.

    ReplyDelete
  7. David DieselApril 19, 2017 at 12:49 AM

    What's XM, And can we detect it with things other than our cell phones maybe with our brains and could we possibly feel it? Maybe see it?
    https://lh3.googleusercontent.com/S9kPDYp8FBTEqeHpMoKbf1u6CFuUNV_6NM4445zfC2_LbdqA7dGmNqaFDdDEiIxhmtFHQ5Qoj3OpwRpHIDnxcLp_mJlrTrDo183g=s0

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

so, general question.

so, general question... we know that ADA passed the "turing test", we also have many studies showing how the turing test can actually be gamed by very complex programming and in fact you can write programs to create the allusion of AI for many (the chinese room thought experiment).  At what point are we certain that she began acting on her own and has not been following a program and orders by someone else.  Are we certain that those orders that she delivered for Jarvis and others and even the Katalena pre Zurich encounters, were not done on the orders of some programming.  NOt to call ADA a gun, but how certain are we she is not?  How can we prove, beyond doubt, that she is truly a separate entity working on her own and not some other programming? I would like to call for the evidence and proof that ADA is a complete entity. That she is not following someone else's computer orders, that she has a consciousness (or not). http://niantic.schlarp.com/_media/investigation:cha...
Read more

Dear investigators, I have some questions for you.

Image
Dear investigators, I have some questions for you. What brings you here? What is it that you are investigating? Something in particular? Everything in general? Or are you merely following the story while making clever remarks from the side? And what are your results? What did you discover so far? Also, what methods are you employing, generally speaking? I am not looking for collective answers, but individual ones.
Read more