On JoJo Stratton​​​​ 's request:

On JoJo Stratton​​​​ 's request:

Anyone noticed that the Face jewelry from the Acolyte is completely different than in the past? Below a Foto of her jewelry, taken from the newest post from H. Richard Loeb​​​. And one Foto of her from the past Obsidian Event.

The stone on her forehead is red instead of green like in the past. Any suggestions??

http://investigate.ingress.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/07/Radiate.jpg

http://9k.9941.yi.org/__efa_25_1_yu6.tbbtyrhfrepbagrag.pbz/-vqMtzND55bU/VwMKfhbTOCI/AAAAAAABPew/bHoq6Kr5K9M0eIbPDdyechs9oN5bxutog/acolyte.jpg

Comments

  1. Dan BaileyJuly 31, 2016 at 11:00 AM

    A red bindi is the traditional color for a married woman. Not sure if she is taking these concepts from Hinduism or just the fashion though. Could be glyph patterns if throwing anything out there too.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Jannes Van SlootenJuly 31, 2016 at 12:01 PM

    Dan Bailey so she is probarly maried now? Didn't Hank Johnson said yesterday or so that ancient tatoos, jewelry etc. meaned more than just decoration?

    ReplyDelete
  3. Jannes Van SlootenJuly 31, 2016 at 12:02 PM

    "Take tribal tattoos and body modification as an example. They didn't engage in that practice purely for aesthetic reasons. They were channeling gods, spirits and a myriad of other invisible powers in the universe. They used it to guide the hunt, to create more powerful warriors or mothers, to enhance themselves against the dangers they faced."

    ReplyDelete
  4. Xavier Frost (turntecGodhead)August 1, 2016 at 10:04 PM

    It could also be an artifact/result of the color filter on the first photograph. Changes to the overall colorway of the photograph alters how we perceive what the colors really are.

    See this for example
    http://blog.xrite.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/03/Beau-Lotto-Cube-Illusion-color-perception.png

    ReplyDelete
  5. Sparks MoranNovember 6, 2016 at 9:34 AM

    Of course, The Acolyte's liturgical dress is inconsistent according to pre-existing religious rules. The Enlightened are a new religion. We shouldn't expect their traditions to look exactly like anything that came before them.

    At best, the Enlightened is a syncretic religion, assimilating traits from nearby 'compatible' religions because it had no history of its own.

    At worst, it's a completely fake religion, cynically constructed by aliens using whatever they thought would appeal to the target audience of gullible new age seekers.

    If the Enlightened is a genuine movement, it will stabilize and formalize is tractions like any other religion, leading to a predictable (if still derivative) appearance for its leadership.

    On the other hand, is the Enlightened movement is an alien scam, is leadership will continue to dress somewhat randomly.

    Hell, they're probably just decorating her with random bits of jewelry harvested from their previous victims.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

so, general question.

so, general question... we know that ADA passed the "turing test", we also have many studies showing how the turing test can actually be gamed by very complex programming and in fact you can write programs to create the allusion of AI for many (the chinese room thought experiment).  At what point are we certain that she began acting on her own and has not been following a program and orders by someone else.  Are we certain that those orders that she delivered for Jarvis and others and even the Katalena pre Zurich encounters, were not done on the orders of some programming.  NOt to call ADA a gun, but how certain are we she is not?  How can we prove, beyond doubt, that she is truly a separate entity working on her own and not some other programming? I would like to call for the evidence and proof that ADA is a complete entity. That she is not following someone else's computer orders, that she has a consciousness (or not). http://niantic.schlarp.com/_media/investigation:cha...
Read more

Dear investigators, I have some questions for you.

Image
Dear investigators, I have some questions for you. What brings you here? What is it that you are investigating? Something in particular? Everything in general? Or are you merely following the story while making clever remarks from the side? And what are your results? What did you discover so far? Also, what methods are you employing, generally speaking? I am not looking for collective answers, but individual ones.
Read more