In this transcription of the dialogue between OLW and the Acolyte, we find a row of small, nearly unreadable...

In this transcription of the dialogue between OLW and the Acolyte, we find a row of small, nearly unreadable characters at the end. When you enlarge them, you get:

XXIII MXI XII XXIX XXXXI MXI I III XXX XI IX XI CMXI I XII MMIII MMXI MMMXX XX

This seems to be a sequence of Roman numbers. Translated into our numbers, they read:


23   1011  12  29  41  1011 1 3  30  11  9  11  911  1 12  2003  2011  3020  20

Right now, I´m at a loss of what they may mean or if they mean something at all. Do you have any ideas?
http://investigate.ingress.com/2016/05/10/safe-for-now/

Comments

  1. Ramil ShayahmetovMay 11, 2016 at 1:17 AM

    Alt+23 = ↨
    Alt+1011 = є
    Etc...
    Try to google...

    ReplyDelete
  2. Andreas Decker (thedeacon1972)May 11, 2016 at 2:09 AM

    Ramil Shayahmetov Thanks for the hint, but I still don´t see any meaning in this line of signs. I tried ASCII too, but to no avail. Please "enlighten" me further  ;-)

    ReplyDelete
  3. Andreas Decker (thedeacon1972)May 11, 2016 at 7:39 AM

    ANSII doesn´t work, too.

    ReplyDelete
  4. RyanMay 13, 2016 at 11:53 AM

    did anyone figure this out yet?

    ReplyDelete
  5. Andreas Decker (thedeacon1972)May 13, 2016 at 12:27 PM

    Yes. With the help of ingress.codes here on G+.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

so, general question.

so, general question... we know that ADA passed the "turing test", we also have many studies showing how the turing test can actually be gamed by very complex programming and in fact you can write programs to create the allusion of AI for many (the chinese room thought experiment).  At what point are we certain that she began acting on her own and has not been following a program and orders by someone else.  Are we certain that those orders that she delivered for Jarvis and others and even the Katalena pre Zurich encounters, were not done on the orders of some programming.  NOt to call ADA a gun, but how certain are we she is not?  How can we prove, beyond doubt, that she is truly a separate entity working on her own and not some other programming? I would like to call for the evidence and proof that ADA is a complete entity. That she is not following someone else's computer orders, that she has a consciousness (or not). http://niantic.schlarp.com/_media/investigation:cha...
Read more

Dear investigators, I have some questions for you.

Image
Dear investigators, I have some questions for you. What brings you here? What is it that you are investigating? Something in particular? Everything in general? Or are you merely following the story while making clever remarks from the side? And what are your results? What did you discover so far? Also, what methods are you employing, generally speaking? I am not looking for collective answers, but individual ones.
Read more