A Conversation with H. Richard Loeb

A Conversation with H. Richard Loeb 

So, I had this conversation with Richard Loeb, aka P.A Chapeau, days before he would go on to launch Investigate:Ingress. 

Given the latest conversation Steven Wilson began involving Amaziah Lachish, I remembered that I still hadn't bothered to upload this conversation. 

To be honest, even after months of sitting on this, I still hadn't made full heads or tails of it all. Maybe someone here smarter than I can figure it out for me. 

-Mustafa. 














Comments

  1. Josias Baez (Noobboy45)March 26, 2016 at 6:23 PM

    So he doesn't even know who is Amaziah? That's more complicated than I thought...

    ReplyDelete
  2. Lore BordagarayMarch 26, 2016 at 6:23 PM

    How do you conantact these people?

    ReplyDelete
  3. Mustafa SaidMarch 26, 2016 at 6:24 PM

    TrIsten Bordagaray I just poke them every once in a while. :) 

    Josias Baez Only one who probably knows who he is is Amaziah himself.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Melissa WikkedimpMarch 26, 2016 at 6:38 PM

    A few things jumped out at me. "Or a name behind a name" "the past becomes a portrait of itself" "a representation, not the truth."
    What to make of them? I don't know

    ReplyDelete
  5. Achim S.March 26, 2016 at 8:09 PM

    Maybe I see ghosts but PAC mentioned "Citadel" in his newest post and now I read "Lachish".

    “Now after the time that Amaziah did turn away from following the LORD they made a conspiracy against him in Jerusalem; and he fled to Lachish: but they sent to Lachish after him, and slew him there.”

    Was Amaziah a Magnus turning into an Anti-Magnus? A necronomicon Researcher.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Steven WilsonMarch 27, 2016 at 2:50 AM

    Thanks for this Mustafa Said​! I had a feeling that Anaziah's potential involvement with flint dille​ would generate a renewed discussion about his/her identity.

    For those who missed it, the poll is here:
    https://plus.google.com/113334464233687310319/posts/HuBv83d216L

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

so, general question.

so, general question... we know that ADA passed the "turing test", we also have many studies showing how the turing test can actually be gamed by very complex programming and in fact you can write programs to create the allusion of AI for many (the chinese room thought experiment).  At what point are we certain that she began acting on her own and has not been following a program and orders by someone else.  Are we certain that those orders that she delivered for Jarvis and others and even the Katalena pre Zurich encounters, were not done on the orders of some programming.  NOt to call ADA a gun, but how certain are we she is not?  How can we prove, beyond doubt, that she is truly a separate entity working on her own and not some other programming? I would like to call for the evidence and proof that ADA is a complete entity. That she is not following someone else's computer orders, that she has a consciousness (or not). http://niantic.schlarp.com/_media/investigation:cha...
Read more

Dear investigators, I have some questions for you.

Image
Dear investigators, I have some questions for you. What brings you here? What is it that you are investigating? Something in particular? Everything in general? Or are you merely following the story while making clever remarks from the side? And what are your results? What did you discover so far? Also, what methods are you employing, generally speaking? I am not looking for collective answers, but individual ones.
Read more