Recovered from today's dead drop in DC


Recovered from today's dead drop in DC

Comments

  1. Mike WissingerFebruary 6, 2016 at 2:41 PM

    No participant (not necessarily just 2 in the room) is Devitt, Lorazon, or Calvin. Good chance the gray boxes are R.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Steven WilsonFebruary 6, 2016 at 4:50 PM

    Could Hanks contact "R" be Raquel Sanchez, the listed founder of IQ Tech?
    http://commondatastorage.googleapis.com/pac/IB/04/item/IQTech_profile.jpg

    ReplyDelete
  3. Mustafa SaidFebruary 6, 2016 at 5:03 PM

    Steven Wilson Incredibly interesting! Never noticed that.

    ReplyDelete
  4. William Willemstyn IIIFebruary 6, 2016 at 7:10 PM

    I try to follow... But no one even tries to make it easy.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Steven WilsonFebruary 7, 2016 at 2:16 AM

    Thanks Mustafa Said​! Do we know anything about Dr. Sanchez? I'd always assumed that Calvin was in charge. Clearly he is still trying to piece together the events of his last recursion.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Achim S.February 7, 2016 at 9:55 AM

    Could it be possible Prof. R? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sAcLaXklAww#action=share
    He worked together with Dr. Kureze and maybe he was PAC´s Prof at Berkeley in 1994.

    ReplyDelete
  7. Mustafa SaidFebruary 7, 2016 at 10:29 AM

    Achim S. Again, incredibly interesting!!!
    Not sure if it's him. I'd be very surprised if he somehow got away from the NIA. Wonder how he ended up at IQTech.

    ReplyDelete
  8. Achim S.February 7, 2016 at 10:48 AM

    Mustafa Said​​ we know that Prof. R., Dr. Calvin and Dr. Kureze worked together within Corporate Cover Lab A662. Maybe A662 changed to IQ TECH and Prof. R. is Dr. Raquel Sanchez. These are my thoughts about.

    Edit: Prof. R. can't be Dr. Raquel Sanchez. 😂

    ReplyDelete
  9. Mustafa SaidFebruary 7, 2016 at 11:00 AM

    Achim S. I'm thinking that Rachel Sanchez is female while we clearly can see Prof. R is male.

    ReplyDelete
  10. Achim S.February 7, 2016 at 11:03 AM

    Mustafa Said​​​ you're right! 😂 Devil's sometimes in the Detail. I should have investigated with more attention...

    ReplyDelete
  11. Steven WilsonFebruary 8, 2016 at 12:36 AM

    Good ideas everyone. I think it is very strange that we don't know anything about the founder of IQTech Research​. Is Dr. Raquel Sanchez still in-charge? If not, what happened to her? What is/was her agenda?

    ReplyDelete
  12. Achim S.February 8, 2016 at 3:49 AM

    From some documents we know that meanwhile after closing of The Niantic Project Dr. Ezekiel Calvin is CEO of IQTech Research​.

    ReplyDelete
  13. Achim S.February 15, 2016 at 11:16 PM

    Yesterday I read something interesting about a contract murder of the Viator Hank Johnson​ by Lorazon. So behind that contract murder there was IQTech Research​. Calvin knew about that job but didn't thought it was the salvation. Would R be a Contact of Hank, employee of IQ TECH and Hank's enemy at the same time?

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

so, general question.

so, general question... we know that ADA passed the "turing test", we also have many studies showing how the turing test can actually be gamed by very complex programming and in fact you can write programs to create the allusion of AI for many (the chinese room thought experiment).  At what point are we certain that she began acting on her own and has not been following a program and orders by someone else.  Are we certain that those orders that she delivered for Jarvis and others and even the Katalena pre Zurich encounters, were not done on the orders of some programming.  NOt to call ADA a gun, but how certain are we she is not?  How can we prove, beyond doubt, that she is truly a separate entity working on her own and not some other programming? I would like to call for the evidence and proof that ADA is a complete entity. That she is not following someone else's computer orders, that she has a consciousness (or not). http://niantic.schlarp.com/_media/investigation:cha...
Read more

Dear investigators, I have some questions for you.

Image
Dear investigators, I have some questions for you. What brings you here? What is it that you are investigating? Something in particular? Everything in general? Or are you merely following the story while making clever remarks from the side? And what are your results? What did you discover so far? Also, what methods are you employing, generally speaking? I am not looking for collective answers, but individual ones.
Read more