Folks are aware of the hidden embed text in Loeb's translation post, yes?
The blockquote text reads, in full:
Susanna, if we are going to find what is within that metal box and discover the truth, we absolutely need to find the key. ismesivfhmqtfieacsersnI'll need the help of Agents this weekend. I will be in touch.
The "ismesivfhmqtfieacsersn" part is invisible on the webpage.
(I'm capable of applying codebreaking techniques to that kind of stuff... but I'm clearly not good at it, compared to others in the community. It takes me a fairly long time to decode that kind of stuff, and I'm too busy with work right now to invest that kind of effort. :-/ )
Essex members as you are aware essex and our member Lukas Lentz credibility , were attacked by the Global Data Analysis Group. It is in our interest to show our unity as independent researchers now more than ever. Today earlier a post was made with me ( Hugo Neves ) as it's writer in order to make sure we had a fast reply out there. It is in our interest that we show our unity by signing our names to one post . The question I make is do we use the same post or a new one for this Also please today try and make posts or sign in the main Niantic one with the following hashtag #TrustLukas To show support for our colleague Lukas Lentz https://plus.google.com/101577681173166935630/posts/XxjSGChLb5x
I am beginning to catalogue a list of Transdimensional Objects which appear to be inert artifacts, but, in fact, have actual technological capabilities when exposed to XM or present in a Nest. Let us start with the Shōnin Stone (which I believe to be broken at this point). We know that it functions as something analogous to part of a circuit board or a key, depending on how you perceive it. There is also Azmati's Dagger (or is it Alexander the Greats, I can't remember) that was used to test for simulacra. My feeling is that there are more such objects. I am trying to catalogue them. And as a thought experiment, what other objects must there be that have not yet been found?
so, general question... we know that ADA passed the "turing test", we also have many studies showing how the turing test can actually be gamed by very complex programming and in fact you can write programs to create the allusion of AI for many (the chinese room thought experiment). At what point are we certain that she began acting on her own and has not been following a program and orders by someone else. Are we certain that those orders that she delivered for Jarvis and others and even the Katalena pre Zurich encounters, were not done on the orders of some programming. NOt to call ADA a gun, but how certain are we she is not? How can we prove, beyond doubt, that she is truly a separate entity working on her own and not some other programming? I would like to call for the evidence and proof that ADA is a complete entity. That she is not following someone else's computer orders, that she has a consciousness (or not). http://niantic.schlarp.com/_media/investigation:cha...
Folks are aware of the hidden embed text in Loeb's translation post, yes?
ReplyDeleteThe blockquote text reads, in full:
Susanna, if we are going to find what is within that metal box and discover the truth, we absolutely need to find the key. ismesivfhmqtfieacsersnI'll need the help of Agents this weekend. I will be in touch.
The "ismesivfhmqtfieacsersn" part is invisible on the webpage.
(I'm capable of applying codebreaking techniques to that kind of stuff... but I'm clearly not good at it, compared to others in the community. It takes me a fairly long time to decode that kind of stuff, and I'm too busy with work right now to invest that kind of effort. :-/ )
ReplyDeleteI want to learn. How to brake the code.
ReplyDelete26 lines of message text in the shape of a key
ReplyDeleteand 22 characters in the hidden text ismesivfhmqtfieacsersn
The image is labelled Contact