so, general question... we know that ADA passed the "turing test", we also have many studies showing how the turing test can actually be gamed by very complex programming and in fact you can write programs to create the allusion of AI for many (the chinese room thought experiment). At what point are we certain that she began acting on her own and has not been following a program and orders by someone else. Are we certain that those orders that she delivered for Jarvis and others and even the Katalena pre Zurich encounters, were not done on the orders of some programming. NOt to call ADA a gun, but how certain are we she is not? How can we prove, beyond doubt, that she is truly a separate entity working on her own and not some other programming? I would like to call for the evidence and proof that ADA is a complete entity. That she is not following someone else's computer orders, that she has a consciousness (or not). http://niantic.schlarp.com/_media/investigation:cha...
S. Is for seeker- truth seeker and clue seeker.
ReplyDeleteI never connected the two names, but it's so obvious now
ReplyDeletei have often wondered about reekes and red and all as well
ReplyDeleteRed, I think Red is someone else... Rekees Hturt though... That's a bit mind blowing to think that it could be connected to Verity / Truthseeker somehow. And what about Xxxxxx? 😨
ReplyDeleteVerities and clues....
ReplyDelete