With the latest #glyph being discovered upon the "Creativity" artifact, we are luckily immediately satisfied with...


With the latest #glyph being discovered upon the "Creativity" artifact, we are luckily immediately satisfied with it's meaning.  However we are still faced with accurately representing this glyph on the calibration glyph.
Opinions, agents?

Comments

  1. Derek AllenMarch 5, 2014 at 7:40 AM

    Personally, I think it is A. It's what makes the most sense to me.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Karsten RolandMarch 5, 2014 at 7:42 AM

    A also makes the most sense.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Sachith MadurangaMarch 5, 2014 at 7:47 AM

    Yeah it would make more sense if the center vertex is involved

    ReplyDelete
  4. Daniel van OsMarch 5, 2014 at 7:50 AM

    A for me as well, creativity very close to 'mind'

    ReplyDelete
  5. Daniel Beaudoin (SK8ZION)March 5, 2014 at 8:15 AM

    If you add two other similar looking glyphs to A, it appears to make a triangle similar to the one in the Ingress logo.  If you add two other glyphs that look like B, it would encase the outer hexagon leaving the central triangle a negative space.
    (Does that make sense?)

    ReplyDelete
  6. Jason Stephens (JST3P)March 5, 2014 at 10:54 AM

    "The creativity of the shapers"?? How do we know they are creative, because their drug makes people creative? That's not the same thing.

    ReplyDelete
  7. Anthony CastanzaMarch 5, 2014 at 1:09 PM

    https://plus.google.com/103320655754019011706/posts/Bxp8T9meDyd

    Its A. Sort of, they skip one of the points since they're using the old calibration grid.

    ReplyDelete
  8. Daniel Beaudoin (SK8ZION)March 5, 2014 at 1:48 PM

    Yep!  Thank you Ingress!

    ReplyDelete
  9. Daniel Beaudoin (SK8ZION)February 11, 2015 at 10:21 AM

    Just to put this post to rest, the correct glyph was finally realized, thanks to the post that Anthony Castanza​​ shared. The corrected glyph can be seen here: http://Glyphtionary.com/glyphs/Creativity.png

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Essex members as you are aware essex and our member Lukas Lentz credibility , were attacked by the Global Data...

Essex members as you are aware essex and our member Lukas Lentz  credibility ,  were attacked by the Global Data Analysis Group. It is in our interest to show our unity as independent researchers now more than ever. Today earlier a post was made with me ( Hugo Neves ) as it's writer in order to make sure we had a fast reply out there. It is in our interest that we show our unity by signing our names to one post . The question I make is do we use the same post or a new one for this Also please today try and make posts or sign in the main Niantic one with the following hashtag #TrustLukas To show support for our colleague Lukas Lentz  https://plus.google.com/101577681173166935630/posts/XxjSGChLb5x
Read more

so, general question.

so, general question... we know that ADA passed the "turing test", we also have many studies showing how the turing test can actually be gamed by very complex programming and in fact you can write programs to create the allusion of AI for many (the chinese room thought experiment).  At what point are we certain that she began acting on her own and has not been following a program and orders by someone else.  Are we certain that those orders that she delivered for Jarvis and others and even the Katalena pre Zurich encounters, were not done on the orders of some programming.  NOt to call ADA a gun, but how certain are we she is not?  How can we prove, beyond doubt, that she is truly a separate entity working on her own and not some other programming? I would like to call for the evidence and proof that ADA is a complete entity. That she is not following someone else's computer orders, that she has a consciousness (or not). http://niantic.schlarp.com/_media/investigation:cha...
Read more

I am beginning to catalogue a list of Transdimensional Objects which appear to be inert artifacts, but, in fact,...

I am beginning to catalogue a list of Transdimensional Objects which appear to be inert artifacts, but, in fact, have actual technological capabilities when exposed to XM or present in a Nest.  Let us start with  the Shōnin Stone (which I believe to be broken at this point).  We know that it functions as something analogous to part of a circuit board or a key, depending on how you perceive it.  There is also Azmati's Dagger (or is it Alexander the Greats, I can't remember) that was used to test for simulacra. My feeling is that there are more such objects.  I am trying to catalogue them.   And as a thought experiment, what other objects must there be that have not yet been found?
Read more