I know, I keep posting...

I know, I keep posting...

Who is coming to Austin for the Anomaly?  When are people getting in?

Do we want to do an Essex meetup pre-anomaly?  (As in the day before.)  Post-anomaly? (At the after party or the day after?)  The morning of and during we will likely all be busy with (feh) faction stuff.  Let me know and I will scout places for us to have a meetup.

Should we see if we can get some face time with Susanna Moyer and Hank Johnson ?  (Maybe we can pester Joe Philley and/or flint dille as well?)  We could video it and post it somewhere.

Thoughts?  Questions?  Answers?

Comments

  1. chris meredithMarch 4, 2014 at 9:03 PM

    The unreliable, untrustworthy Susanna Moyer will be putting her(corporate) spin on the anamoly in Austin

    ReplyDelete
  2. Michelle EMarch 4, 2014 at 9:04 PM

    So, is that a yes you're going to be there or a no?

    ReplyDelete
  3. Melissa L.March 4, 2014 at 9:05 PM

    I would prefer post anomaly. Before gets a little too hectic and people will be more relaxed with the completion past and refreshments.

    I would love to get face time with any of of those four either as a group or individually. Also, don't forget Brian Rose will be there too.

    ReplyDelete
  4. chris meredithMarch 4, 2014 at 9:06 PM

    Michelle E sorry, I will not be able to attend, work has been getting in the way of my ingressing for the last month. I wanted to attend so I could visit cedar park where I used to live

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

so, general question.

so, general question... we know that ADA passed the "turing test", we also have many studies showing how the turing test can actually be gamed by very complex programming and in fact you can write programs to create the allusion of AI for many (the chinese room thought experiment).  At what point are we certain that she began acting on her own and has not been following a program and orders by someone else.  Are we certain that those orders that she delivered for Jarvis and others and even the Katalena pre Zurich encounters, were not done on the orders of some programming.  NOt to call ADA a gun, but how certain are we she is not?  How can we prove, beyond doubt, that she is truly a separate entity working on her own and not some other programming? I would like to call for the evidence and proof that ADA is a complete entity. That she is not following someone else's computer orders, that she has a consciousness (or not). http://niantic.schlarp.com/_media/investigation:cha...
Read more

Essex members as you are aware essex and our member Lukas Lentz credibility , were attacked by the Global Data...

Essex members as you are aware essex and our member Lukas Lentz  credibility ,  were attacked by the Global Data Analysis Group. It is in our interest to show our unity as independent researchers now more than ever. Today earlier a post was made with me ( Hugo Neves ) as it's writer in order to make sure we had a fast reply out there. It is in our interest that we show our unity by signing our names to one post . The question I make is do we use the same post or a new one for this Also please today try and make posts or sign in the main Niantic one with the following hashtag #TrustLukas To show support for our colleague Lukas Lentz  https://plus.google.com/101577681173166935630/posts/XxjSGChLb5x
Read more

I am beginning to catalogue a list of Transdimensional Objects which appear to be inert artifacts, but, in fact,...

I am beginning to catalogue a list of Transdimensional Objects which appear to be inert artifacts, but, in fact, have actual technological capabilities when exposed to XM or present in a Nest.  Let us start with  the Shōnin Stone (which I believe to be broken at this point).  We know that it functions as something analogous to part of a circuit board or a key, depending on how you perceive it.  There is also Azmati's Dagger (or is it Alexander the Greats, I can't remember) that was used to test for simulacra. My feeling is that there are more such objects.  I am trying to catalogue them.   And as a thought experiment, what other objects must there be that have not yet been found?
Read more