so, general question... we know that ADA passed the "turing test", we also have many studies showing how the turing test can actually be gamed by very complex programming and in fact you can write programs to create the allusion of AI for many (the chinese room thought experiment). At what point are we certain that she began acting on her own and has not been following a program and orders by someone else. Are we certain that those orders that she delivered for Jarvis and others and even the Katalena pre Zurich encounters, were not done on the orders of some programming. NOt to call ADA a gun, but how certain are we she is not? How can we prove, beyond doubt, that she is truly a separate entity working on her own and not some other programming? I would like to call for the evidence and proof that ADA is a complete entity. That she is not following someone else's computer orders, that she has a consciousness (or not). http://niantic.schlarp.com/_media/investigation:cha...
Perhaps a question regarding if Agents (us) will have the ability to interact with Chaotic Matter in the near future?
ReplyDeleteAlso, will there be an 8 Singularity or will there be a plan to break away from this soon?
Will there be a time when agents can create their own shards/artifacts and stage local anomaly type events?
ReplyDeleteDo you think Ingress/NIantic can be used in some format by teachers in the classroom? Would Niantic Labs consider (or is it already a potential) creating a game using the Niantic/Ingress engine for teachers/classrooms/educational organizations?
I would like to know if the API for the intel map will ever be public. Similar to the Twitter API for instance.
ReplyDeleteThe current intel map is a burden to work with, the hacked version is too powerful, giving users an unfair advantage (and an additional disadvantage to non users due to the traffic it creates).
By opening up part of the API, and using throttling (?)/QoS mechanisms like the twitter API this could become more balanced.