While not my best work, it is all that I could do with such a low res sample.


While not my best work, it is all that I could do with such a low res sample. What I did is shift the colors around a bit to bring out the secondary glyph Anthony Castanza mentioned earlier.  The first is me tracing over the outline in the second, the third is the original. Interestingly, what lead me to think the secondary glyph was different than the overlaying glyph turned out to be nothing more than a smaller grid for the second glyph.

Comments

  1. Anthony CastanzaDecember 11, 2013 at 10:26 PM

    Very nicely done!! My conclusions exactly only much more firmly based.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Dean NDecember 11, 2013 at 10:33 PM

    Thanks, a funny side note. To bring out the lines in the secondary glyph to be able to see it more clearly I had to modify the midtone values to -100 cyan and +100 green.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Daniel Beaudoin (SK8ZION)December 12, 2013 at 6:33 AM

    Very nice indeed.  Apparently this area has been utilized again, and again...

    ReplyDelete
  4. Drew DonderoDecember 12, 2013 at 8:14 AM

    Interesting how there are 6 dots around it.  Just an observation

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

so, general question.

so, general question... we know that ADA passed the "turing test", we also have many studies showing how the turing test can actually be gamed by very complex programming and in fact you can write programs to create the allusion of AI for many (the chinese room thought experiment).  At what point are we certain that she began acting on her own and has not been following a program and orders by someone else.  Are we certain that those orders that she delivered for Jarvis and others and even the Katalena pre Zurich encounters, were not done on the orders of some programming.  NOt to call ADA a gun, but how certain are we she is not?  How can we prove, beyond doubt, that she is truly a separate entity working on her own and not some other programming? I would like to call for the evidence and proof that ADA is a complete entity. That she is not following someone else's computer orders, that she has a consciousness (or not). http://niantic.schlarp.com/_media/investigation:cha...
Read more

Essex members as you are aware essex and our member Lukas Lentz credibility , were attacked by the Global Data...

Essex members as you are aware essex and our member Lukas Lentz  credibility ,  were attacked by the Global Data Analysis Group. It is in our interest to show our unity as independent researchers now more than ever. Today earlier a post was made with me ( Hugo Neves ) as it's writer in order to make sure we had a fast reply out there. It is in our interest that we show our unity by signing our names to one post . The question I make is do we use the same post or a new one for this Also please today try and make posts or sign in the main Niantic one with the following hashtag #TrustLukas To show support for our colleague Lukas Lentz  https://plus.google.com/101577681173166935630/posts/XxjSGChLb5x
Read more

I am beginning to catalogue a list of Transdimensional Objects which appear to be inert artifacts, but, in fact,...

I am beginning to catalogue a list of Transdimensional Objects which appear to be inert artifacts, but, in fact, have actual technological capabilities when exposed to XM or present in a Nest.  Let us start with  the Shōnin Stone (which I believe to be broken at this point).  We know that it functions as something analogous to part of a circuit board or a key, depending on how you perceive it.  There is also Azmati's Dagger (or is it Alexander the Greats, I can't remember) that was used to test for simulacra. My feeling is that there are more such objects.  I am trying to catalogue them.   And as a thought experiment, what other objects must there be that have not yet been found?
Read more