Transcript of Susanna Moyer's interview with Roland Jarvis:

Transcript of Susanna Moyer's interview with Roland Jarvis:

S
(to jarvis)
excuse me! 

(in ingress report style)
i'm here with someone who appeared at the cupids span portal today after the anomaly,
claiming to be roland jarvis

J
(calmly cuts her off)
there is no doubt as to who i am, susanna.
none at all.
its nice to finally meet you.

S
yes, we'll get to that...
who are you really?
how is what you're saying even possible?!

J
you would not believe what is possible, susanna.
i can asure you of that.
but i am very, very real...
and... thanks to your friends in the N...I...A...
i have experienced things you are not yet ready to understand.

S
save that for your believers.
i'm here for the facts about xm.
where it comes from.
how it affects human beings.

J
start by asking your father, susanna.
then... look in the mirror.
you more than most people should know
the answer to the question of what xm does to people.

S
leave my father out of this.
...
how are you getting this information?!
who do you work for?!

J
susanna!
(in disbelief)
you haven't listened to my message.
i don't "work" for anyone!
i am part of the ultimate now.
you see the wave. i see the water.

S
what the hell does that mean?!

J
the answers lie within YOU, susanna.
all you have to do, is look.

S
we're done here.

J
(looks into her eyes with a smile, and then quietly)
thank you.

S
(visibly shaken)

Comments

  1. Rory DurkinDecember 15, 2013 at 8:57 AM

    Video Link:

    INGRESS REPORT | Live In San Francisco - Operation #13MAGNUS

    ReplyDelete
  2. Dean NDecember 15, 2013 at 2:13 PM

    Thanks for writing this up, in looking at the dialog exchanged it would seem that the missing shards have had 0 affect on Roland's reappearance (except for the limited time construct comment he had with OLW.)

    ReplyDelete
  3. Rory DurkinDecember 15, 2013 at 5:15 PM

    Hard to say what effect the missing shards would have. We would have to ask someone trustworthy who knew him before he was "killed" if he seems different somehow. An infinite being visiting a finite realm would assure some amount of imperfection... and can we even define "perfection"?

    ReplyDelete
  4. João ValdiviessoDecember 15, 2013 at 7:03 PM

    You see the wave. I see the water.

    Could this be perceived as the way Neo sees the matrix code, and the others see the result of it? A sort of content versus form, and therefore making him a more aware being (of the xm, in this case), a ultimate like he said.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Essex members as you are aware essex and our member Lukas Lentz credibility , were attacked by the Global Data...

Essex members as you are aware essex and our member Lukas Lentz  credibility ,  were attacked by the Global Data Analysis Group. It is in our interest to show our unity as independent researchers now more than ever. Today earlier a post was made with me ( Hugo Neves ) as it's writer in order to make sure we had a fast reply out there. It is in our interest that we show our unity by signing our names to one post . The question I make is do we use the same post or a new one for this Also please today try and make posts or sign in the main Niantic one with the following hashtag #TrustLukas To show support for our colleague Lukas Lentz  https://plus.google.com/101577681173166935630/posts/XxjSGChLb5x
Read more

so, general question.

so, general question... we know that ADA passed the "turing test", we also have many studies showing how the turing test can actually be gamed by very complex programming and in fact you can write programs to create the allusion of AI for many (the chinese room thought experiment).  At what point are we certain that she began acting on her own and has not been following a program and orders by someone else.  Are we certain that those orders that she delivered for Jarvis and others and even the Katalena pre Zurich encounters, were not done on the orders of some programming.  NOt to call ADA a gun, but how certain are we she is not?  How can we prove, beyond doubt, that she is truly a separate entity working on her own and not some other programming? I would like to call for the evidence and proof that ADA is a complete entity. That she is not following someone else's computer orders, that she has a consciousness (or not). http://niantic.schlarp.com/_media/investigation:cha...
Read more

I am beginning to catalogue a list of Transdimensional Objects which appear to be inert artifacts, but, in fact,...

I am beginning to catalogue a list of Transdimensional Objects which appear to be inert artifacts, but, in fact, have actual technological capabilities when exposed to XM or present in a Nest.  Let us start with  the Shōnin Stone (which I believe to be broken at this point).  We know that it functions as something analogous to part of a circuit board or a key, depending on how you perceive it.  There is also Azmati's Dagger (or is it Alexander the Greats, I can't remember) that was used to test for simulacra. My feeling is that there are more such objects.  I am trying to catalogue them.   And as a thought experiment, what other objects must there be that have not yet been found?
Read more