Here is my question has anyone been able to go to the CDC and verify if Roland Jarvis' body is still there and the...
Here is my question has anyone been able to go to the CDC and verify if Roland Jarvis' body is still there and the one who appeared is using a new body? or is the body gone from the CDC and that is some sort of hyperthread body recapture that happened?
According to the BOLO document the body is missing from the CDC.
ReplyDeleteJarvis referred to his current body as a "construct".
so meaning it is prolly not his own body
ReplyDeleteUnknown. Technically, everything is a construct.
ReplyDeletewhether he considers all organized structured matter to be constructs from his perspective in the XM fabric remains to be seen, but we have no idea where the purloined cadaver was taken.
ReplyDeleteI belive this body isn't natural but he has to use it because his old body is severely damaged
ReplyDeleteHis old body was incapable of being damaged, at all.
ReplyDeleteSo how did he die? something had to happen to it snd it prevented him from using it
ReplyDeleteHe was shot in the head. Then, the wound completely vanished.
ReplyDeleteAll attempts at an autopsy completely spontaneously reverted.
So perhaps he uses this body as a temporary construct in order to find and re-possess his old body
ReplyDeleteAscetism, seeing all matter as an illusion, may be a sane philosophical response to his rcent experience.
ReplyDeleteThe old body was stolen from the CDC by "extremists" and was taken to SF. Wasn't that in a NP release last week? Or am I hallucinating
ReplyDeleteJim Typhoon that was one of the "theories" that the document presented
ReplyDeleteMy money is on the body being where Hank was filming.
ReplyDeleteIn fact, it might have been being transported in while he was there, hence the firefight.
I think this is body but since being artificially reformed it classifies as construct. referencing Frankenstein revivification.
ReplyDeleteDaniel Benton , I wouldn't even be surprised if Hank was the one transporting it in.
ReplyDeleteChiel Groeneveld I think that much would have been obvious from the video...
ReplyDelete